The Late Great Toned Coin Lie

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by V. Kurt Bellman, Jul 2, 2018.

  1. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    Lol
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. WFN

    WFN Member

    There has never been a shortage of blast white Morgans. Those who can remember in the 1950's and 60's at coin shows and shops, few colorfully toned coins, silver was either white or grey dirt, with a small number from National Coin albums or paper envelopes that had color.

    By the 1970's some collectors were intentionally toning coins in kraft envelopes and many other methods, which expanded in coming decades. Now you see cases of toners at shows with all kinds of colorful tarnish, IMO most are intentionally toned. There is no clear definition of AT/NT - it is all tarnish, which is corrosion. So the collecting world uses words such as toning and patina that sound much better than labeling an item as corroded. Collectors pay huge premiums for the right tarnish- which feeds the AT doctors.
     
    Last edited: Jul 4, 2018
    thomas mozzillo likes this.
  4. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    I am troubled by the marks in the field. Unless the reverse is absolutely pristine. It stays in the 66 camp for me.
     
  5. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

    I wonder what percentage of toned coins that go to NGC and PSGS are given a grade and what percentage are deemed “questionable color,” if such stats are kept. That info might shed some light on Kurt’s points.
     
  6. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Right on that count.

    Wrong on that one !
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page