Medievals: A Tale of Two Gigliati (poll)

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by lordmarcovan, Jun 10, 2018.

?

Which do you like better FOR THE MONEY ... if either?

  1. Coin A

    4 vote(s)
    12.5%
  2. Coin B

    20 vote(s)
    62.5%
  3. I like 'em both (but I don't collect medievals)

    1 vote(s)
    3.1%
  4. I like 'em both (and I DO collect medievals)

    2 vote(s)
    6.3%
  5. Don't really care for either (but I don't collect medievals)

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  6. Don't really care for either (and I DO collect medievals)

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  7. I don't feel qualified to answer

    1 vote(s)
    3.1%
  8. You should probably order pizza

    9 vote(s)
    28.1%
  9. Nah, skip the pizza

    1 vote(s)
    3.1%
  10. My name is TIF and I think these polls are stupid

    2 vote(s)
    6.3%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. Milesofwho

    Milesofwho Omnivorous collector

    Fresh from the oven. 37D193B3-DE3C-4656-A54F-3DF155834012.jpeg
     
    spirityoda, zumbly, TheRed and 4 others like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Bing

    Bing Illegitimi non carborundum Supporter

    Now the sharpness of the edges look good to me, I would like to see more. And what about the size and weight? :rolleyes:
     
    zumbly likes this.
  4. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    Size? Medium. Hand tossed Extravagazza. Substitute roasted red peppers for mushrooms (I like mushrooms, but not the ones most pizza places use.)

    Weight? Dunno 'bout the pizza, but it's now part of my own not-inconsiderable weight. Scales fear me.
     
    Bing likes this.
  5. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    I checked Bid Inside and found one that was bid to €25 but it lacked the eye appeal of either of these and was also clipped.

    Turns out I am at least slightly familiar with Dea Moneta after all, but had forgotten about it. Doing a search there, I found this beauty in an Artemide Aste listing ... but it has a €300 pricetag.

    676D.jpg 676R.jpg
     
  6. Milesofwho

    Milesofwho Omnivorous collector

    At that price, the second one is a steal!
     
  7. Milesofwho

    Milesofwho Omnivorous collector

    One of the points that I forgot to mention on the second coin was that the cross on the globe is off-center. I thought that was funny.
     
  8. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    If the second one (Coin B in the original post) had the same kind of contrasting toning as the first (Coin A), I'd be all over it (when I had the money). But it doesn't.

    As has already been demonstrated, I have a weakness for that kind of toning.
     
  9. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    Wow, it sure is! It's almost like the engraver was trying to shift it to make it fit inside the inner beaded circle!

    3091_2467900l.jpg
     
  10. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    Speaking of great medievals, this one has been on my radar for a while, but at $450, it isnt likely to be taking up residence in my Eclectic Box anytime soon.

    475039.jpg

     
  11. TheRed

    TheRed Well-Known Member

    I don't collect French provincial coins, but that is a stunner.

    I would go with coin B, the detail and full flan are worth the extra money in my opinion.
     
    lordmarcovan likes this.
  12. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    By the time I got up the funds to pursue Coin B in this poll, I'd be far more likely to pursue this, which is in an auction at the end of this month.

    4142734l.jpg

    What say ye, @Curtisimo, since we've spoken on the topic?
     
  13. FitzNigel

    FitzNigel Medievalist

    These coins are abundant (at least lately - maybe a new hoard was found?), and have been selling in large lots on ROMA for a while now. I think you can find a nicer example for cheaper.
     
  14. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    I might forget all about these and go galloping after that Lizzie groat instead. Time will tell.
     
  15. ominus1

    ominus1 Well-Known Member

    i'm with Oldhoopster..plus the few that are telling you to shop around:)
     
    lordmarcovan likes this.
  16. Curtisimo

    Curtisimo the Great(ish)

    I love the Elizabeth I. I was glad you pointed out the Lizzie that currently lives with me. I'm not above taking in Eclectic Box rejects / misfits :p:D
    Elizabeth_I_AR_Sixpence_1575.jpg
    Obviously your new target has a much better portrait. It's an interesting double strike as well.

    Between coin B and Lizzie I'd have to go with the Lizzie but not by much. The OP option B is a lovely coin. If it's a fixed offering I wonder if you could negotiate the price down? I'm flattered you would ask my opinion as you definitely have a much better eye for medievals than me based on your current stock of eclectic delights and your previous ownership of coins such as this Ragusan beauty.

    https://collectivecoin.com/lordmarcovan/SL50Qie7LLIUhnykKUjI/50GF09mNuC1KNuFYjyke
     
  17. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    Well, the current medieval portion of my Eclectic Box is more pitiful than it was with the bygone inclusions, all of which got sold for one reason or another (mostly the old 20-coin limit I abandoned a year ago).

    That Ragusa grosso was great. @dadams owns it now, and you likely won't get it from him. Besides, if it leaves his collection, it needs to come back to mine!

    Re. the stuff here, when it's OP Coin B versus the Elizabeth I groat above, there's no contest. Lizzie wins easily.

    This is what I was getting at in the discussion about the inherent dilemma here. At $111-ish, Coin A in the OP stacks up reasonably well against everything else I could buy for that money (except perhaps some small proof gold). But at $223-ish, Coin B is in competition with a lot more potentially interesting things on my radar. (And due to the eclectic nature of my collection, my radar scope has a pretty wide sweep across many different categories at once.)
     
    Curtisimo likes this.
  18. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    PS- gigliato Coin B does have a "make offer" button in its MA-shops listing, while Coin A does not. But the portrait and toning on that Lizzie groat have now sufficiently distracted me to the point of nearly forgetting about the two gigliati here altogether.

    In the perfect scenario, I'd find a dated QE1 sixpence from 1565 (400 years before my birthyear) or 1588 (Spanish Armada, yo!) ... with perfect "CircCam" contrast and a nice portrait and flan. At an affordable price.

    As to the 1575 sixpence which @Curtisimo posted (which his bride recently wore in her shoe, per tradition) - that coin totally dominated all the <$100 examples I saw out there. Had it been just the tiniest bit higher grade, it would've qualified for Eclectic Box inclusion and Curtis' bride would've needed a different lucky sixpence for her shoe. :)
     
    Curtisimo likes this.
  19. CircCam

    CircCam Victory

    Could someone explain what "clipped" means and why it was done? Thanks.

    Coin A here, but Elizabeth wins overall IMO. @lordmarcovan How big are these coins out of curiosity?
     
    lordmarcovan likes this.
  20. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    You're probably more used to seeing the term "clipped" in the context of clipped planchet errors on more modern coins, but in a medieval coin context, "clipping" refers to the practice of people shaving metal off the edges of precious-metal coins, to save a bit of the silver or gold for illegal gain. It's a practice that sent many a coin clipper to the gallows (or worse) back in the day.

    The replacement of the old thin hammered silver coins with milled coins bearing reeded or lettered edges was largely done as a deterrent against this practice. In fact, some early British milled coins bore the Latin inscription DECVS ET TVTAMEN ("an ornament and a safeguard") on their edges, indicating the lettered edge was put on there not just to look nice, but also to make it obvious when someone had clipped a coin.

    As to your second question, I have never yet held a Neapolitan gigliato coin in hand, but as the equivalent of a grosso, I would imagine they'd be vaguely near the diameter of a US nickel?
     
  21. Pellinore

    Pellinore Well-Known Member

    What a nice thread. I would go for coin B. In a few months, you will have forgotten the price and only the quality remains. Those lions of the throne are real, whereas the first coin shows two sad poodles. And the clipping will irritate you soon, as I had with this Sicilian pierreale of Pedro III of Aragon and Constantia of Hohenstaufen (1282-1285). It's damage that pokes you in the eye, that diverts you from the beauty of the design, once you realise the coin was clipped.

    4822 Pierreale.jpg
    This is 20-22 mm and 1.90 gr. and it cost about $50.

    On the other hand, I bought this silver coin for $75, a large and thin Venetian mocenigo lira of Doge Agostino Barbarigo from the year 1494, 33 mm and 6.84 gr. The obverse shows San Marco and kneeling doge, the reverse a nimbate Christ with cross. It has a plugged hole.

    4877 Venice 1494 co.jpg
    The clipped pierreale leads to ever seeking a better version. The handsome lira gives a contented feeling.
     
    lordmarcovan and Curtisimo like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page