What do you all think about this coin? What's it worth? The average MS62 goes for in the range of 40 thousand and change. https://www.pcgs.com/cert/34902903
For $30k i would rather not have that unsightly lamination. Although, it makes the Indian look like he is in the process of getting scalped...alive
Isn't this coin on the pcgs forums for sale for a while now? That lamination is distracting for this rare error.
Some lamination errors can look pretty cool, but this one is kinda ugly IMO. But lamination errors are not valuable at all in general. In fact, many error collectors couldn't care less about them. The ones I know, anyway.
Haven't I heard folks here say that an error often detracts from the value of a key date, rather than adding to it?
This one the lamination is sort of ulgy....I guess depending on what the lamination looks like it may or may not add value for the error or eye appeal. In this case I don't believe anyone including the owner would want the specimen to be without the damage. Shame great variety nice looking coin if you can look past the scar.
I wouldn't say that is necessarily the case . . . there are definitely collectors of such white elephants, and they may pay significant premiums over what you would expect, but they are fewer and further between, therefore affecting the liquidity of the coin. It can take much longer for the seller of such a coin to find the right buyer. Edited . . . after re-reading your post, I recognize you qualified your question with "often", and my answer should have been a more concise, YES.
Eh, I'm a fast reader. I wasn't at all sure that there are collectors willing to pay a "compound premium" for key-date errors, so the long-form answer was useful to me. Thanks!
Though there is probably a strict definition somewhere that makes a lamination an error as opposed to damage, to me it is an undesirable defect. I can't say there isn't some error hound out there that wouldn't pay more for it, but personally I'd value it considerably less than the MS62 price.