1918/7-D Buffalo Nickel in PCGS MS62 with an obverse planchet lamination

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by BustHalfNut, May 28, 2018.

  1. BustHalfNut

    BustHalfNut Member

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    With the nice attributed Lamination.. Just add an extra $30.00 - $40.00 to the value
     
  4. BustHalfNut

    BustHalfNut Member

    Not sure if this is a joke? No offense intended.
     
  5. heavycam.monstervam

    heavycam.monstervam Outlaw Trucker & Coin Hillbilly

    For $30k i would rather not have that unsightly lamination.
    Although, it makes the Indian look like he is in the process of getting scalped...alive:nailbiting:
     
  6. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    I gave you my honest quote.. I have been collecting Mint Errors for 31 years now.
     
    Paddy54 likes this.
  7. Mkman123

    Mkman123 Well-Known Member

    Isn't this coin on the pcgs forums for sale for a while now? That lamination is distracting for this rare error.
     
    Rick Stachowski likes this.
  8. Rick Stachowski

    Rick Stachowski Motor City Car Capital

    And money ( price ) ...
     
  9. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    Some lamination errors can look pretty cool, but this one is kinda ugly IMO. But lamination errors are not valuable at all in general. In fact, many error collectors couldn't care less about them. The ones I know, anyway.
     
  10. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    Haven't I heard folks here say that an error often detracts from the value of a key date, rather than adding to it?
     
  11. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

    This one the lamination is sort of ulgy....I guess depending on what the lamination looks like it may or may not add value for the error or eye appeal.
    In this case I don't believe anyone including the owner would want the specimen to be without the damage. Shame great variety nice looking coin if you can look past the scar.
     
  12. ToughCOINS

    ToughCOINS Dealer Member Moderator

    I wouldn't say that is necessarily the case . . . there are definitely collectors of such white elephants, and they may pay significant premiums over what you would expect, but they are fewer and further between, therefore affecting the liquidity of the coin. It can take much longer for the seller of such a coin to find the right buyer.

    Edited . . . after re-reading your post, I recognize you qualified your question with "often", and my answer should have been a more concise, YES.
     
    Last edited: May 28, 2018
  13. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    Eh, I'm a fast reader. ;)

    I wasn't at all sure that there are collectors willing to pay a "compound premium" for key-date errors, so the long-form answer was useful to me. Thanks!
     
  14. savitale

    savitale Well-Known Member

    Though there is probably a strict definition somewhere that makes a lamination an error as opposed to damage, to me it is an undesirable defect. I can't say there isn't some error hound out there that wouldn't pay more for it, but personally I'd value it considerably less than the MS62 price.
     
  15. Michael K

    Michael K Well-Known Member

    ^^^^^^
    I agree with the grade. But sometimes, aren't planchet errors considered details?
     
  16. savitale

    savitale Well-Known Member

    I’m not an error expert, but I consider laminations in a grey area between mint error and damage.
     
  17. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

    Damage occurs after mintage... errors occur before or durring so this is considered an error
     
    Michael K and TypeCoin971793 like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page