I been looking in the wild for a long time for one of these . So let get it started . First here's the images from Coins and Canada web site . http://coinsandcanada.com/coins-prices.php?coin=1-cent-1965&years=1-cent-1965-1989 First image will be the large Bead . Next image will be the Small Bead . Last, is the beads on my coin . Easy to see it's the Large Bead . Next, here's the images from Coins and Canada web site for the Pointed 5 . This image from the site will be the Blunt 5 . Last, is the Date on my coin . Easy to see it's the Pointed 5 . Here's the original images without the lines . Don't want to forget the full shots .
Your lines drawn for the pointed/blunt are off. In the final photo of your coin, it looks to be a blunt 5.
It's not that far off . So lets look at the 6 in the date The blunt 5 has a bend in the shaft on the 6 . The pointed 5 has a smooth bend in the shaft on the 6 . Easy to see it's the pointed 5 . Look how smooth the bend in the shaft on the 6 is . Which again makes it a pointed 5 .
Guys look at the inside bar of the 5 . Look at the pointed 5 . Now look at the blunt 5 . Now here's mine . Again, pointed 5 .
Just normal die deterioration will make coins appear to be different. I still think that it looks like a blunt 5, but I'm nowhere near an expert on small cents (I'm only slightly above the novice level). However, I spent most of the last 20 years trying to decipher large cent varieties, so I'm well aware of normal die wear vs something modified by the mint.
Here's a ebay list of sales . http://coinsandcanada.com/coins-auctions-prices.php?denomination=1&date=1965&Send=Search
Here's the last image I'll post . First image is the pointed 5 . Second image is my coin . Last image is the blunt 5 .
Truthfully, that doesn't help me due to my ignorance on what similar year coins that high of grade would cost. Was hoping for Yes/No and maybe something like 10% or so more than the years before and after.
The Charlotte standard catalogue says, small beads = A points between beads and large beads = A points at the bead. Also I agree with the blunt 5 not pointed 5. The pointed five has an almost 45 degree angle. The angle of your coin’s five is nowhere near that of the example of the pointed five that you have posted.