Define a “cleaned” coin

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by TypeCoin971793, Apr 29, 2018.

  1. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    I read your post wrong. Ignore me. In my defense I was a bit inebriated.
     
    roman99 and wxcoin like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. wxcoin

    wxcoin Getting no respect since I was a baby

    Hey, that's my defense! A good scotch defense!!!!!!
     
    TypeCoin971793 likes this.
  4. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    I figured as much.

    The thing I worry about is the folks reading me saying "cleaning" and the whole time thinking I'm talking about "harsh cleaning". Nothing could be further from the truth ! If and when I mean harsh cleaning I will say harsh cleaning - every single time.

    Cleaning = no harm, good.

    Harsh cleaning = harm, bad.
     
  5. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    In that case your terms may need changing to reflect the common mentality brought about by the ambiguity in the TPG’s designations. If a novice collector stumbles across a post that says “cleaned coins are good,” then he/she might be inspired to clean his/her coins without regard to the potential damage it may cause. But if the qualifier “properly” is used, there is no ambiguity. Same thing with “harshly cleaned.” A novice collector may see that “harsh cleanings are the bad cleanings,” and think that a gentle wipe with a soft cloth is permissible where a scrubbing with a brush is not. Again, if the term “improperly” is used, there is no ambiguity.

    Another term I use for what you call “harshly cleaned” coins is “abrasively cleaned.” Again, no ambiguity.
     
  6. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    I quite often say it this way - harsh/improperly. Harsh cleaning, improper cleaning, they mean the same thing.

    I understand your point, but there is no way that a novice is going to know what improperly means any more than he knows what harsh means. The only point that must always be made is that there is a difference between cleaning and harsh cleaning.

    Cleaning = no harm, good.

    Harsh cleaning = harm, bad.

    That, says everything right there.
     
    imrich and Kentucky like this.
  7. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    My point is that the novice will see improper and/or proper and will realize that there is a right and wrong way to clean a coin. This will raise questions and spur research.

    I guess we will agree to disagree
     
  8. SilverDollar2017

    SilverDollar2017 Morgan dollars

    IMO, a properly cleaned/conserved coin should not be labeled as "cleaned". Cleaning coins improperly is still bad.
     
  9. Kentucky

    Kentucky Supporter! Supporter

    Yes, but how many angels can dance on the head of a pin...
     
  10. mynamespat

    mynamespat Well-Known Member

    What shall we say shall we call it by a name?
     
  11. Kentucky

    Kentucky Supporter! Supporter

    Fred
     
    mynamespat likes this.
  12. mynamespat

    mynamespat Well-Known Member

    ...Where is Insider? This thread is extremely lacking in the smiley and colorful text. This isn't really a thread on cleaning coins until the excessive smileys and colorful text are abundant.
     
    TypeCoin971793 and Kentucky like this.
  13. Kentucky

    Kentucky Supporter! Supporter

    Terminology is always tricky in most every field. A friend of mine who teaches high school physics can go on for hours about the misuse of "power" and "energy".
     
    TypeCoin971793 likes this.
  14. Seniorchief

    Seniorchief New Member

    Amen! I bought a couple of Morgans that were cleaned (and not mentioned in the sales ad) and one encapsulated by PCGS that was not gradable. But you know what? I like them and will keep them in my collection. They're beautiful.
     
  15. baseball21

    baseball21 Well-Known Member

    That's a big reason why I just simplify it to conservation and cleaned where cleaned means something that wouldn't straight grade.

    Conservation may technically be cleaning, but an outsider reading it will have no idea about that
     
    TypeCoin971793 and Kentucky like this.
  16. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    And it's my contention that using the word conservation just confuses the matter even more. And not just for novices, but for everybody.

    Years ago there were only two phrases, two words - cleaned and harshly cleaned. And everybody knew what they meant, what somebody was talking about when they said it. There was no confusion.

    Then, somebody came along and decided to "dress things up a bit" - put lipstick and makeup on it, to make it look better, sound better. And they started using conservation when what they really meant was cleaning - plain old ordinary cleaning. A word that everybody understood. Not some fancy euphemism used just to make it easier to sell things.

    I guess it just bugs me that folks can't just be straightforward and honest about things. That they have to dress it up, make it look and sound better - put a spin on it ! Purely for the sake of advertising.

    And the worst part is - folks buy into that crap :(
     
    imrich likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page