I figured as much. The thing I worry about is the folks reading me saying "cleaning" and the whole time thinking I'm talking about "harsh cleaning". Nothing could be further from the truth ! If and when I mean harsh cleaning I will say harsh cleaning - every single time. Cleaning = no harm, good. Harsh cleaning = harm, bad.
In that case your terms may need changing to reflect the common mentality brought about by the ambiguity in the TPG’s designations. If a novice collector stumbles across a post that says “cleaned coins are good,” then he/she might be inspired to clean his/her coins without regard to the potential damage it may cause. But if the qualifier “properly” is used, there is no ambiguity. Same thing with “harshly cleaned.” A novice collector may see that “harsh cleanings are the bad cleanings,” and think that a gentle wipe with a soft cloth is permissible where a scrubbing with a brush is not. Again, if the term “improperly” is used, there is no ambiguity. Another term I use for what you call “harshly cleaned” coins is “abrasively cleaned.” Again, no ambiguity.
I quite often say it this way - harsh/improperly. Harsh cleaning, improper cleaning, they mean the same thing. I understand your point, but there is no way that a novice is going to know what improperly means any more than he knows what harsh means. The only point that must always be made is that there is a difference between cleaning and harsh cleaning. Cleaning = no harm, good. Harsh cleaning = harm, bad. That, says everything right there.
My point is that the novice will see improper and/or proper and will realize that there is a right and wrong way to clean a coin. This will raise questions and spur research. I guess we will agree to disagree
IMO, a properly cleaned/conserved coin should not be labeled as "cleaned". Cleaning coins improperly is still bad.
...Where is Insider? This thread is extremely lacking in the smiley and colorful text. This isn't really a thread on cleaning coins until the excessive smileys and colorful text are abundant.
Terminology is always tricky in most every field. A friend of mine who teaches high school physics can go on for hours about the misuse of "power" and "energy".
Amen! I bought a couple of Morgans that were cleaned (and not mentioned in the sales ad) and one encapsulated by PCGS that was not gradable. But you know what? I like them and will keep them in my collection. They're beautiful.
That's a big reason why I just simplify it to conservation and cleaned where cleaned means something that wouldn't straight grade. Conservation may technically be cleaning, but an outsider reading it will have no idea about that
And it's my contention that using the word conservation just confuses the matter even more. And not just for novices, but for everybody. Years ago there were only two phrases, two words - cleaned and harshly cleaned. And everybody knew what they meant, what somebody was talking about when they said it. There was no confusion. Then, somebody came along and decided to "dress things up a bit" - put lipstick and makeup on it, to make it look better, sound better. And they started using conservation when what they really meant was cleaning - plain old ordinary cleaning. A word that everybody understood. Not some fancy euphemism used just to make it easier to sell things. I guess it just bugs me that folks can't just be straightforward and honest about things. That they have to dress it up, make it look and sound better - put a spin on it ! Purely for the sake of advertising. And the worst part is - folks buy into that crap