now here is a paradox to this argument if I took a photograph of this pika chu image would it me a image or a picture
What's the use, what gave you the idea to recreate something we see day in and day out, and expect a different response? It was never a doubled die, didn't even look like one.
Mr Waggers, I agree that trying to provoke false interpretations of coin phenomena in order to get your jollies is not a relationship this forum needs. So either pack up your bag and begone or become a functional member of the forum.I am sure you know what I mean, and know what I will do if this happens again. Jim
Could the response : " Now I see a lighting artifact from the warm-colored light coming from the right" had meant anything else? What artificial effect did the light create other than a doubled - die effect? Do you think I was accused of turning on the lampshade on my desk to recreate the effect of machine doubling or I was being accused of faking die deterioration?
You need not to ask any questions regarding special lighting artifacts coming from the right, and the creation of doubled-dies to me, but to my interlocutor, the creator of these concepts.
Again " Just defending oneself" is not an acceptable answer. We read each report even if they are not valid in opinion. You did not create a doubled die with light, you tried to fake the appearance of a doubled die with lighting. Others do it with photoshop, but any such way is still fake.
He has effectively destroyed any future credibility with anything he posts in the future. I would have expected this from a child, not someone 37 years old. I have never blocked anyone but neither will I ever answer another post from Mr. Waggers. You all might/can but I fear it would end up just like this, a 6 page thread of his utter nonsense. Kudos to you Kurt for trying.