What Might This Beauty Be?

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by bbfan454, Dec 7, 2007.

  1. bbfan454

    bbfan454 Junior Member

    If this was on the shop floor I'd figure it to be a slug. However it is with a batch of U.S. and British coins dated from 1700 to 1890 so it may have one day been a coin. It is non-magnetic and is about the same diameter and thickness as an 1730 British farthing I was asking about in another thread. Doesn't show, but there a ghost image on one side. On the edge it has what looks like "for one dollar" making me think it might be some sort of token. Any thoughts?
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    ????????????
    Good question.
     
  4. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    If you are sure that it is "non-metalic", what is it? The first plastic was bakelite which did not come into use until 1920's. Prior to that, "non-metalic" would be...... Wood is all I know of.
     
  5. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    rlm:
    bakelite was around before then: Wikipedia:
    Bakelite is a material based on the thermosetting phenol formaldehyde resin, polyoxybenzylmethylenglycolanhydride developed in 1907–1909 by Belgian-American Dr. Leo Baekeland.
     
  6. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    Yes, it was invented by Thomas Edison prior to the 1920's. My words were that it did not "come into use" until the 1920's.
     
  7. Snowman

    Snowman Senior Member

    is the picture shown the side with the ghost image ?

    and what size is it like ? quarter, small dollar. half dollar ??? :confused:
     
  8. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    It's a 1799 large cent. Congrats!





















    Seriously, I have no idea.
     
  9. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    Lettered edge half cent. He said it is roughly the size of a 1730 farthing Our large cent was roughy the size and weight and value of a British halfpenny of the era. So a half cent should be about the size of a farthing. And the edge of the 1793 - 1797 half cents said TWO HUNDRED FOR A DOLLAR (I am assuming he has read the edge slightl wrong or paraphrased i when he posted it here.)

    On the word HUNDRED are the letters all close together or is there almost enough space between them to put another letter in between each of them? (This will help narrow down the date range.)

    I can see a little of something on the coin in your picture but not enough to make out exactly what it is.

    An accurate weght might be helpful as well. Grams to at least two decimals. (Will give clues as to planchet stock and whether it is a very worn coin or a blank planchet.)
     
  10. DJP7x0s

    DJP7x0s Sometimes Coins Arouse Me

    Just to point out to RLM, he said non Magnetic and not non metalic
     
  11. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    Off-topic now but what else for the time period would be non-metallic? Glass, ceramic, or porcelain.

    And Bakelite was not the first plastic, celluloid preceded it. Celluloid was invented n 1856 and the first large scale production use of it came in 1870.
     
  12. bbfan454

    bbfan454 Junior Member

    I mis-spoke on size as I thought my 1730 British coin was a farthing. With your hints i compared it to some large U.S. cents and this thing is the same size. However my better large cents do not have anything on the edges. So I guess this coin more likely says "100 FOR A DOLLAR" (can't read the "100" though) not the 200 a half would have. Thanks

    So what should one do with such a coin that is only identifiable as a coin?
     
  13. Bonedigger

    Bonedigger New Member

    Kinda reminds me of Alfred Hitchcock.
     
  14. Ed Goldman

    Ed Goldman coin collector

    That coin has to be atleast worth 1 cent.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page