1910 LWC Is this Wexler's "moderate thickness"? WDDR-001

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by Nolan Workman, Mar 3, 2018.

  1. Nolan Workman

    Nolan Workman Well-Known Member

    10p.jpg 10p1.jpg 10p2.jpg 10p3.jpg 10p6.jpg 10p5.jpg
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    That is the hardest to see from photos, because we don't have a size comparison in photos. Also seems to have wear on the devices this can cause some flattening of the letters.
     
  4. Nolan Workman

    Nolan Workman Well-Known Member

    Any help? I submit Wexler's example shows flattening as well. You have to love the detail on the wheat stalks for 108 years old on a circulated coin. It is subjective, but I submit the dot between the E and P on this coin is thicker than Wexler's example. IS_34.jpg IS_35.jpg IS_36.jpg
     
  5. JayF

    JayF Active Member

    Post the link to Wexler's DDR-001, maybe there'll be images there that people can compare your coins to and hopefully get a better response. I like your coin tho, nice detail!
     
  6. Nolan Workman

    Nolan Workman Well-Known Member

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page