Specimen Coins

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by lovecoinswalkingliberty, Feb 10, 2018.

  1. lovecoinswalkingliberty

    lovecoinswalkingliberty Well-Known Member

    1994 and 1997 jeffreson nickels
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. baseball21

    baseball21 Well-Known Member

    They just don't want them mixed in with the MS ones which would ruin the pops there. All the satin ones have Satin written on the label in giant letters though
     
  4. lovecoinswalkingliberty

    lovecoinswalkingliberty Well-Known Member

  5. baseball21

    baseball21 Well-Known Member

    And I'm just pointing out that those are a unique situation the TPGs had to deal with. Once they put Satin on the label it really invalidates the SP part of the grade and shows the SP is just being used as a place holder to say it's different than the MS. The older SP coins are a much different animal
     
  6. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    To my way of thinking what the TPGs call/designate what is and what isn't a Specimen is all kind of fishy.

    As I said above, PCGS says this -

    Specimen
    Term used to indicate special coins struck at the Mint from 1792-1816 that display many characteristics of the later Proof coinage. Prior to 1817, the minting equipment and technology was limited, so these coins do not have the “watery” surfaces of later Proofs nor the evenness of strike of the close collar Proofs. PCGS designates these coins SP.

    Proof
    A coin usually struck from a specially prepared coin die on a specially prepared planchet. Proofs are usually given more than one blow from the dies and are usually struck with presses operating at slower speeds and higher striking pressure. Because of this extra care, Proofs usually exhibit much sharper detail than regular, or business, strikes. PCGS recognizes Proofs (PR) as those struck in 1817 and later. Those coins struck prior to 1817 are recognized as Specimen strikes (SP).

    And this -

    Prooflike
    Term to designate a coin that has mirror-like surfaces, the term especially applicable to Morgan dollars. Those Morgan dollars that meet PCGS prooflike standards are designated PL.


    Pay particular attention to the parts I have underlined, and think of them in relation to each other. Once you do that, consider those Kennedy halves above designated as SP and tell me what they have in common to those definitions given.

    Now consider what NGC has to say.

    Strike Type
    MS Mint State. Coins struck in the same format as circulation issues. Applies to grades 60 to 70.
    PF Proof. Coins struck in a special format for collectors.
    SP Specimen. A hybrid between Mint State and Proof.

    PL Prooflike. Applies only to circulation issues. The fields are mirrored and the devices may be frosted on both sides.

    Prooflike indicates that the surfaces exhibit a higher degree of reflectivity than is typically seen on a circulation-issue coin. The fields are mirrored and the devices may be frosted on both sides, reminiscent of a Proof coin.


    Now consider the 60's SMS coins that they designate as SP, the '98 Kennedy they designate as SP, the 2014 Kennedy halves they designate as SP, the '94 and '97 nickels they designate as SP, and even some of the older coins like the 1907 $10 Indian they designated as SP - and tell me what they all have in common with the definitions they provide. And when you do consider the different finishes on the coins.

    Then, if the TPGs are supposed to know what they are doing, why are their definitions and designations so different from each other ? And why, when the two different companies grade the same coins, do they each give those coins different designations ? And why, at different periods of time have they changed their designations for the exact same coins ? And what I mean by that is that in one period the same coin was designated as MS, but in another period designated as SP, or even SMS ? The coins certainly didn't change. The only thing that changed what they decided to call them.

    The point I am trying to make is that nothing jives. They hand out these designations in an arbitrary manner that only seems to meet their company's individual needs for their own benefit, instead of calling the coin what it is based on its method of manufacture and or reason for manufacture. And it is those 2 things, and only those 2 things that determine what type of coin a coin really is.

    Far too many people seem to think that the TPGs are always right and they are the ones who determine what is and what isn't. They think this because the TPGs are supposed to be The Pros From Dover, the ultimate authority on things, the ones who decide things and tell the rest of us what is what.

    Well they aren't folks ! They are merely companies who do what is best for them ! And they don't give two cents about what is best for anybody else, the hobby, or what is actually right or actually wrong. For them, the bottom line is all that matters. And getting as many people as they can to swallow their nonsense and believe it.
     
  7. baseball21

    baseball21 Well-Known Member

    It's a rather simple concept once people figure out that they need to treat SP graded coins pre and post 1950 as different animals because they are. Modern and Ultra Modern SP coins can sometimes just be a designation meaning not MS but not Proof. 1800s/1700s SP coins will be things that are something special.

    It's just like how an MS 68 ASE will be baggy and ugly but an MS 68 Morgan is going to look great. Once we stop trying to lump everything into one box for 200 plus years and realize things can and do mean different things during different time periods it makes more sense. Should they have made a fourth grading designation instead of lumping them into the SP category, maybe but that ship has sailed
     
  8. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    It's not just coins minted pre and post 1950. The TPGs have changed designations on coins minted post 2000 ! For a few years were MS, or SMS, the next year they suddenly became SP.
     
  9. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    One problem with the 1994 1997 Nichols is at the third-party grading services have been inconsistent with what they call them. At different times they have called them matte proof, specimen, or special mint set (SMS). So it's almost impossible to say what they really are.
     
  10. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Sure you can, if you follow the standard and established rules for determining what a coin is. What you cannot do is rely on the TPGs to be the ones who decide what they are.

    The point I have been trying to get across is that far, far, too many people think the TPGs are always right - regarding almost anything about coins. But they aren't always right ! In fact, in some things they are wrong far more often than they are ever right !
     
  11. TheFinn

    TheFinn Well-Known Member

    I have a Van Buren dollar w/o edge lettering graded SP64 by PCGS.
     
  12. gronnh20

    gronnh20 Well-Known Member

    Do you have one graded by NGC?
     
  13. TheFinn

    TheFinn Well-Known Member

    Nope, PCGS.
     
  14. lovecoinswalkingliberty

    lovecoinswalkingliberty Well-Known Member

    [​IMG]

    1793 chain cent, periods PCGS SP67
     
  15. lovecoinswalkingliberty

    lovecoinswalkingliberty Well-Known Member

    Van Buren dollar w/o edge lettering graded SP64

    1907 eagle indian
     
  16. lovecoinswalkingliberty

    lovecoinswalkingliberty Well-Known Member

    Thanks for all this help, and support.

    I will keep posting my research on these coins, and keep this a reference page.
     
  17. lovecoinswalkingliberty

    lovecoinswalkingliberty Well-Known Member

    1965:

    1, 5, 10, 25, and 50 cents

    1966:

    1, 5, 10, 25, and 50 cents

    1967:

    1, 5, 10, 25, and 50 cents



     
  18. lovecoinswalkingliberty

    lovecoinswalkingliberty Well-Known Member

  19. lovecoinswalkingliberty

    lovecoinswalkingliberty Well-Known Member

    2016 centennial gold: merc. stand. and walk., goodcare finish dollar
    [​IMG]PCGS SP70
     
  20. lovecoinswalkingliberty

    lovecoinswalkingliberty Well-Known Member

  21. lovecoinswalkingliberty

    lovecoinswalkingliberty Well-Known Member

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page