Bugs Bunny Franklin 1955

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by ryanbrooks, Nov 26, 2007.

  1. ryanbrooks

    ryanbrooks Active Member

    Why is it called a Bugs Bunny Franklin 1955??????
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Captainkirk

    Captainkirk 73 Buick Riviera owner

    Because Ben has buck teeth, like Bugs bunny, I believe it is a die chip
     
  4. ryanbrooks

    ryanbrooks Active Member

    are there other dates of this error?
     
  5. Indianhead65

    Indianhead65 Well-Known Member

  6. LSM

    LSM Collector

    The book that I have shows 2 dates for the "Bugs Bunny" Franklin and that is 1951 & 1955.

    Lou
     
  7. Indianhead65

    Indianhead65 Well-Known Member

    OK...thanks Lou. I knew there was another date but I wasnt sure which one it was.
     
  8. Speedy

    Speedy Researching Coins Supporter

    There are other dates that have this Bugs Bunny look but most people don't know or don't talk about them. I've seen it on 1953's, 1951,s etc....
    The one that is collected the most is ofcourse 1955, with I think 1956 right behind that. I know of one guy who has a few other dates but I'm not sure what ones. Some of them can get pretty $$$ in MS.

    Speedy
     
  9. ryanbrooks

    ryanbrooks Active Member

    were all 1951's and 1955's have buck teeth, or just some?
     
  10. Daggarjon

    Daggarjon Supporter**

    just some, it all of them had buck teeth - would anyone care? :)
     
  11. AUBU2

    AUBU2 Senior Member

    The information that i found showed that the 1955-P was affected. Also a double die error was found on the 1961 proof from Philly. The Bugs Bunny error was caused by the obverse & reverse dies striking each other without a planchet between them. The resulting die damage caused a split upper lip that ressembled Bugs Bunny. I assume the damaged dies were no longer used once the damage was discovered.
     
  12. AUBU2

    AUBU2 Senior Member

    Warner Brothers might want a royalty if they made a large amount of them.
     
  13. sumorada

    sumorada Senior Member

  14. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    sumorada,

    Only your third link works.
     
  15. Speedy

    Speedy Researching Coins Supporter

    They should work now---they just had an extra http://

    Speedy
     
  16. AUBU2

    AUBU2 Senior Member

    The common variable is dies that hit together without a planchet. So i'd say it probably occurred in other years, only they limited the number probably through tighter quality control.
     
  17. mrbrklyn

    mrbrklyn New Member

    believe its a clash

    Ruben
     
  18. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    Ruben is correct, a die clash.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page