GTG 1881-S PCGS Rattler

65 > 79
64> 78

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

MS-65 PL on the 79-S

 

I'll say picture in OP is MS64. Devices very clean, but fields have luster breaks.

 

Nice Morgans, Nate. What am I, a grading service? Listen, you get one grade from me in each thread, that's it.

 

Lol they’re already graded just testing you should’ve offered a reward for right answers I suppose

 

That's kind of the whole exercise, Nate.

We answer with our grades and learn from our mistakes when the TPG grade is revealed.

 

#2: Solid MS-65
#3: MS-63

 

64
64 (but possibly 65)
64

Bank it !!!

 

All banked. 1st one permanently! Main reason for post was wondering about reslabbing the first. It’s a beauty. Looks like it’s gonna stay rattlin tho

 

I’m going to say #2 and #3 are 64’s

 

81-S ....63 ...there are few marks, but the 2-3 marks are in focal areas and would likely have resulted in a lower grade in the rattler era

79-S...65...minimal marks, newer holder
78-S...64...another one lowered by one point due to the hit on the cheek

...all 3 are very nice; great finds!

 

63
64
62

 

64+

 

#1 - 65
#2 - 66
#3 - 63

 

I'd say the '81-S was given a 64.

 

The '79-S is probably a 65

The '78-S is probably a 64

Nice coins by the way!!

 

81-s 64 And today it’s a 65. Gorgeous cheek and reverse
79-s a 65
78-s 63. Cheek ding hurts it

 

Thanks again for all input, info, and interest. 1881-S is a 65...Thought about some new plastic but you can’t go back the marks at 3 o’clock look like bag marks in hand. The area around 9 detracts the most. Favorite Morgan in my collection appearance-wise.


#2 1879-S is 66+ Beautiful coin, yet the cheek shows worse wear than the 81-S

#3 1878-S is 64PL photos probably don’t do the second 2 justice

 

MS65 for the '79-S and MS63 possibly MS64 for the '78-S depending on severe the railroad track is on the cheek. Lighting can make things look worse than they really are.

 

1878-S MS 64 PL