GTG 1881-S PCGS Rattler

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Nate D, Jan 19, 2018.

  1. Nate D

    Nate D New Member

    Thanks for your input 4EA5A6F4-9014-4851-B3BD-B2DC546EE5AA.jpeg E0C3C7D6-F31B-49A5-A517-1222F2F1F5AA.jpeg 1A8275FE-C971-44EF-8E34-92566619F9BE.jpeg
     
    gronnh20 and McBlzr like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Gilbert

    Gilbert Part time collector Supporter

    MS-65 Beautiful coin.
     
    JPeace$ likes this.
  4. furham

    furham Good Ole Boy

  5. mark_h

    mark_h Somewhere over the rainbow

    Very nice - based off the pictures I think 65.
     
  6. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

    64 then, 65 today
     
    chascat likes this.
  7. Dave Waterstraat

    Dave Waterstraat Well-Known Member

    Rattler grade 64 today 65.
     
    chascat likes this.
  8. mikenoodle

    mikenoodle The Village Idiot Supporter

  9. Sunflower_Coins

    Sunflower_Coins Importer and Exporter

    MS64. It might well be a MS65, beautiful Morgan there, man.
     
  10. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

  11. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    They're murder on these superbly-struck dates. I'm going with MS64. Put a later date on this old girl and she's a gem.
     
  12. Bman33

    Bman33 Well-Known Member

    At first glance I thought 65, then looked at marks in primary focal area from 8-9:30 and I am going with 64. Conservative I know.
     
  13. Nathan401

    Nathan401 Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

    I'll be different. MS 66
     
  14. Kasia

    Kasia Got my learning hat on

    I'm going to be tough...MS63 because I don't think the marks in the field should make it higher... If you can ignore that, a 64 or 65.
     
    Dynoking likes this.
  15. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    I hope she got gem, at least MS65.
     
  16. mikenoodle

    mikenoodle The Village Idiot Supporter

    I'd like to think so, but given an old rattler, I went conservative and said MS-64.
     
  17. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

  18. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

    The slab sez 63 I say 65 and if not for the obv. Marks 66
     
  19. JBOCON

    JBOCON Well-Known Member

  20. Nate D

    Nate D New Member

    Much appreciated all. I'll reveal later so everyone can play. Some side action: #2 1879-S PCGS
    image.jpg image.jpg
    image.jpg

    #3 1878-S PCGS
    image.jpg
    image.jpg
    image.jpg
     
    JPeace$ likes this.
  21. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    Yeah, I agree, Mike. Plus, I think I've seen enough to say, they're inclined to grade these early '80s stricter than the general population, regardless when they were graded.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page