Domna denarius authenticity opinions wanted

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by Roman Collector, Jan 12, 2018.

?

Would you bid on this?

  1. Sure, looks real to me!

  2. Probably -- I think it's okay

  3. Not sure -- may very well be a cast

  4. No way -- it's likely a fake

Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. Roman Collector

    Roman Collector Well-Known Member

    Not e-bay, but in an upcoming auction from an established dealer. This Emesa mint denarius of Julia Domna is very hard to come by and I'm interested in it. But its porous and flaking surfaces make me a little cautious about casting. Any thoughts? Seller's photos.

    Domna SAECVLI FELICITAS Denarius Emesa.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Bing

    Bing Illegitimi non carborundum Supporter

    Just from that image alone, I would say authentic. I see nothing to make me question that.
     
    benhur767 likes this.
  4. benhur767

    benhur767 Sapere aude

    Looks authentic to me, just patchy toning. In fact, it's a die duplicate to another coin on acsearch. Search for domna and the RIC number and you'll find it.
     
  5. maridvnvm

    maridvnvm Well-Known Member

    I don't see anything wrong from the images.
     
  6. kevin McGonigal

    kevin McGonigal Well-Known Member

    Is its weight listed in the auction ad?
     
  7. lrbguy

    lrbguy Well-Known Member

    Looks good to me. Here's a comparison piece, FWIW:
    L541-340-4020541.jpg
    Same mint; obviously different dies. Given the appearance of the surfaces you can check it for evidence of casting, but I'm guessing it will be okay. If you have serious doubts, leave the door open by letting the house know that you will want to return it if it doesn't check out.
     
    Alegandron, Bing and benhur767 like this.
  8. ancient coin hunter

    ancient coin hunter 3rd Century Usurper

    Looks to me to be authentic, a bit of pitting there but presumably it is natural.
     
  9. lehmansterms

    lehmansterms Many view intelligence as a hideous deformity

    Not at all sure where you get the idea that an age-eroded surface like that seen on this coin is the result of it being a modern cast - but no, that is a completely believable piece which has been left very close to the state in which it was discovered and has not (as is all too common) been cleaned to within an inch of its life (and removal of any evidence of authenticity) by someone enamoured of all things "shiny". It might be possible that a very skilled forger could have degraded a struck or pressed modern copy to give it a surface similar to that acquired over a couple millennia-worth of "diagenesis", but someone with those skills could have employed them far more profitably faking other types.
     
  10. alde

    alde Always Learning

    I wouldn't hesitate to bid on it if you like it. It's an interesting coin.
     
  11. dougsmit

    dougsmit Member

    These are hard to find well centered, well struck and with pleasing surfaces. Two out of three is not bad. Mine are worse.
    rk5400bb0041.jpg rk5410bb0868.jpg rk5420bb0543.jpg
     
  12. Roman Collector

    Roman Collector Well-Known Member

    Thank you all. I feel much better about bidding on it!
     
  13. Black Friar

    Black Friar Well-Known Member

    Good luck on the bidding, a very cool coin.
     
    Roman Collector likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page