Member websites (for ancient coins)

After looking at @Gil-galad's webpage I thought I might be nice to have a thread where we could all post our websites for easy reference purposes.

Mine is www.historicalancientromancoins.com

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

I have seen your site lately and I like the variety of coins as well as the blog style which could help with getting people involved at anytime.

If you don't mind me adding your link to my links page, would be great.

 

My website is ResPublicaCoins.com but most of the content is at http://gallery.respublicacoins.com . There is a blog as well but I haven't done much with it, though I plan to work through and do book reviews of various RR coinage and history books at some point. I'm also working on a bibliography of references, papers and hoards I cite and feel are important for the study of Roman Republic coinage but it's only got the major ones listed so far.

 

It would be great if you could add my site. Thanks very much.

 

Very good @Orfew. Here are my Ancient coinage web sites/pages:

• Intoduction to Julio-Claudian Roman Imperial coins - six web page site with Directory
• Britannic coinage and the Tetrarchy - five web page site with Directory
• Britannic coinage and the Tetrarchy - annotated photo gallery - single web page
• Constantinian London Mint coins - annotated photo gallery - single web page
• Roman Imperial coin Inscriptional Lettering - single web page

 

Link?

 

Thanks for asking, Doug.

http://www.forumancientcoins.com/ancientwhitesheet/index.html

I hope you don't mind that right now there is a lot to be done and edited so if something doesn't look right I would like to know. Generally, I want to stay with the same theme that I'm working with right now.

 

Bookmarked! Great idea!


Thanks,
Jacob

 

Below in Signature

 

No, that is not true. The links below the sig are other sites of his and the Tantalus one does not work.

That brings up a point. I deleted the links from my web page about 15 years ago because checking and correcting them became more work than it was worth. A large group of links will have its share of deads and changes. The value of a links page depends of someone being willing to keep up with it. I was not.

 

I have two vanity web sites, but they might be of interest to some collectors.
1) Some bronze coins of Constantine the Great:
http://feltemp.com/Constantine_1.html

2) Roman emperors:
http://feltemp.com/Emperors/Emperors_Page1.html

 

I was talking about mine

 

I like those very much @gsimonel - nice presentation!

 

I see no Ancients.

 

As long as Coin Talk encourages modern collectors to come to the ancient forum and answer questions that do not apply, we will get this sort of thing. Before we were given our separate section, many of us started each post title with ANCIENTS: so there was a chance that people would realize where they were posting. I doubt doing that now would help but I suppose we could try it. I hope none of us who are interested in old coins are spamming the modern/bullion/non coin sections which I never visit. Perhaps we could just ignore the spammers and risk being called unfriendly by the old CT people who are new to ancients who we most certainly do want to participate here. I still believe that much of the problem is that 'Recent Topics' list which might attract activity from people who don't understand or don't care how the lists are divided. Repeated calls for that change have been ignored without so much as a reply. Our only choices are to put up with their decisions or to leave.

 

Me neither!

 

It would be nice if the Recent Topics list reflected the board you are viewing and not CT as a whole! It would cause less confusion.

 

Bookmarked

 

What a great idea for a thread. Thanks for starting it.

Love this one. I might just be able to read the lettering a lot easier now.

 

I have https://www.cointalk.com/forums/ancients/ bookmarked on my toolbar under the title "Ancient Coins." When I click on it to visit the site I get a list of recent topics posted to the ancient section.