F15 or VF20? 1788 Cent, No Period After MASSACHUSETTS

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by J Elliott, Dec 23, 2017.

  1. J Elliott

    J Elliott New Member

    F15 or VF20 on this 1788 Cent, No Period After MASSACHUSETTS? Thanks!
     

    Attached Files:

    steve.e likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. steve.e

    steve.e Cherry picker

    I don't know about the grade.
     
  4. l.cutler

    l.cutler Member

    Colonial/pre Federal coins are tough to put a number on. Strike, planchet quality, die condition etc. are just all over the place. Worn dies, weak strike, thin planchets are all sometimes difficult to discern from wear on the coin. I will say you have a nice Massachusetts cent there though.
     
    Last edited: Dec 23, 2017
  5. mrio

    mrio New Member

    I would say f15
     
  6. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    I would say VG details, environmental damage.

    But these are not my specialty. You'll need to wait for the colonial experts to get here.
     
    C-B-D likes this.
  7. Dimedude2

    Dimedude2 Member

    Vf20, environmental damage
     
  8. KSorbo

    KSorbo Well-Known Member

    F Details, ED. Although it might get net graded down to a straight grade. It has nice detail with no major planchet flaws. It might come down to whether the roughness is due to the planchet or came about later through corrosion.
     
  9. halfcent1793

    halfcent1793 Well-Known Member

    VG but somewhat rough. These are usually smoother in my experience.
     
  10. J Elliott

    J Elliott New Member

    Agreed, colonial coins are very tough to grade. In my opinion it’s very subjective. Even the surface is tough to determine if it has environmental damage. Once I have this graded, I will update everyone with the results. My guess is that it will be graded F15 with no environmental damage, but I think it could pass as a VF20. Thanks for your inputs!
     
  11. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    I would say f details. I have some questions about this one too. I was fooled by an electrotype copy of a 1788 Massachusetts Cent years ago and ive seen a couple old copies since then that had a very similar look. I can’t with certainty call this one genuine and personally I’m skeptical
     
  12. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    My biggest concern is the pits and bumps on the Indian side. I can’t tell from the pics if it’s planchet flaws and corrosion or pits and marks from being cast not struck
     
  13. J Elliott

    J Elliott New Member

    I can definitely see how that could be a concern. Some of the other photos I have seen professionally graded on eBay have some rough looking planchets too and aren’t even getting listed as Environmental Damage. Maybe they were just made with some rough planchets... hope mine is real though. See the attached example of one graded by PCGS. It was graded F15. Thanks!
     

    Attached Files:

  14. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    I understand that. I just had some concerns as I’ve seen some really convincing old fakes and copies that would be very difficult to tell in a pic. As to the graded one I’d give that a details grade all the way
     
  15. l.cutler

    l.cutler Member

    The difficulty in grading Colonials definitely extends to the grading services, they are very inconsistent with them. Most colonial collectors actually prefer their coins raw. I feel confident yours is genuine, but who knows what a grading service will say about it otherwise. I think this is a Ryder 6-N variety.
     
    J Elliott likes this.
  16. J Elliott

    J Elliott New Member

    Coin update: I received this coin back from NGC. They graded it Fine details with environmental damage.
     
    Beefer518 likes this.
  17. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    I can see the grade. Glad it was legit
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page