Grade my 1939 Rev of 40 Jefferson Nickel

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Lehigh96, Dec 15, 2017.

?

What is the grade of my Jefferson Nickel?

  1. AU58

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. MS60-62

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. MS63

    5.0%
  4. MS63 5FS

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  5. MS64

    20.0%
  6. MS64 5FS

    10.0%
  7. MS65

    45.0%
  8. MS65 5FS

    15.0%
  9. MS66

    5.0%
  10. MS66 5FS

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    Please vote in the attached poll for your opinion of the grade of this nickel.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    As always, comments welcome!
     
    TexAg likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    Strike: Appears well struck. There is none of that "planchet roughness" BS on his jaw, and the columns are all clear.

    Luster: Appears to be quite lustrous, and I'll bet it shines when you rotate it. Your pictures usually show luster pretty well, however, which has me questioning it.

    Eye Appeal: Natural patina is emphasized by subtle toning, more colorful on the reverse.

    Contact marks: The fields are quite clean. There are a number of significant marks on the obverse, but they are well hidden in the design (eyebrow, hair, ear, etc).

    Overall, this is the type of coin that, if the luster shines well, I'm sure would be 66 by any TPG, and any old timer would call 65. If the luster is dull-ish, like your pictures indicate, this is a solid 64+ that the TPGs would call 65.

    Key point - While the steps appear generally quite well struck, there is enough bridging on this coin that it should *not* get a FS. If any TPG called this FS, I'd question their reputability.
     
    TexAg likes this.
  4. mikenoodle

    mikenoodle The Village Idiot Supporter

    Are the marks under pillar #3 on the slab or the coin?
     
  5. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    Mike, the coin is raw.
     
  6. mikenoodle

    mikenoodle The Village Idiot Supporter

  7. Kirkuleez

    Kirkuleez 80 proof

    Agreed, MS-65. It would be a nice high end 65, but I would expect a little more luster at 66. Pretty one, it’s go beautifully in my set.
     
  8. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    65 was my vote. I did go FS, but that was a shot in the dark as I'm not really used to determining that attribute.
     
  9. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    This coin ticks me off. The obverse is dull and lifeless and no better than MS63 quality due to the lack of luster. The reverse is MS66/67 quality with rainbow toning and and outside chance at full steps. I grade this coin MS64. Unfortunately, it isn't worthy of a TPG submission, it will garner very little as a raw coin on E-Bay, and the obverse will stand out as a dog if I use it in my album collection.
     
  10. messydesk

    messydesk Well-Known Member

    I'll say 65 on this one. The obverse had me thinking there could be a touch of rub on Jefferson's shoulder, but there's nothing else on the obverse to indicate wear. It's just a bit dull. The reverse is the stand-out side of this one.
     
  11. TexAg

    TexAg Well-Known Member

    I did not offer a grade as I am too new at it, but enjoyed reading everyone's comments!
     
  12. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    I am at MS-64. The obverse looked like an AU coin, but I saw no wear. The reverse is pretty.
     
    Lehigh96 likes this.
  13. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

    You got a two face coin in 64 5 fs depending on the grader
     
  14. scopru

    scopru Member

    Maybe just my eyes - the N in Monticello - something going on there at the bottom of the letter or just glare?
     
  15. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    I think it’s just a contact mark that made the bottom of the N disappear.
     
  16. scopru

    scopru Member

    I am in at ms64. Not fs. Really beautiful coin though.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page