Christian era Roman siliqua

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by Joseph Sarkissian, Nov 26, 2017.

  1. Joseph Sarkissian

    Joseph Sarkissian Active Member

    Silver siliqua, AR21, pearl-diademed emperor bust left, reverse two emperors seated which seem to have two captives kneeling at their feet, VOTA PU-BLICA, Constantinople mint. I still can't figure out which emperor this coin belongs to. Valens seems to be the closest, but can't find the silver version of this coin anywhere on wildwinds.
     

    Attached Files:

    Theodosius, randygeki and TJC like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. 7Calbrey

    7Calbrey Well-Known Member

    High Joe. The nearest match I could find on Wildwinds for the reverse of your coin is RIC- 16b. But it was struck in Nicomedia and composed of gold. Please check it there. That could help you before resorting to Catbite site. Good luck.
     
  4. Severus Alexander

    Severus Alexander find me at NumisForums

    As far as I know, this coin doesn't exist in silver. Might be the core of a previously gold-coated fourrée... could the metal be lead or a lead alloy? What's the weight?
     
  5. Valentinian

    Valentinian Well-Known Member

    Your coins says it is of Valens. Roman Silver Coins volume V is on late Roman silver and virtually complete, but nothing like it is in there--no VOTA PVBLICA at all.

    Have you considered the possibility is it a cast of a gold type? We need the diameter and weight of it. There is doubt it is ancient.
     
  6. Andres2

    Andres2 Well-Known Member

    Theodosius, Alegandron and Bing like this.
  7. Joseph Sarkissian

    Joseph Sarkissian Active Member

    2.73g. Could it be counterfeit? This is a mystery. What do you think? I can't even find a gold coin with the exact design.
     
  8. Joseph Sarkissian

    Joseph Sarkissian Active Member

    2.73g. Could be. I am no expert in counterfeits, is there a rationale behind this aberration? Thanks for your input
     
  9. KIWITI

    KIWITI Well-Known Member

    Looks cast.
     
    David@PCC and 7Calbrey like this.
  10. hoth2

    hoth2 Well-Known Member

    I thought it looked cast off the bat. That the type doesn't exist in that metal makes it seem even more likely..
     
    7Calbrey likes this.
  11. Severus Alexander

    Severus Alexander find me at NumisForums

    If I were betting, I would bet on a modern cast. If the weight were closer to 4g (would have to contain lead), an ancient (cast) fourrée core would seem a possibility, though still a bit of a stretch. (A siliqua should be around 2g, and a solidus around 4g.) Here is the imitated type, w/ same mintmark.
     
    Andres2 and 7Calbrey like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page