GTG—1904o Morgan

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Morgandude11, Nov 22, 2017.

  1. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Okay, go for it. Latest acquisition.

    8F4AF9DC-7A1C-48B6-AA5F-BA7ED6D8E0D1.jpeg 04CB238C-FA30-4F8A-B541-243A19884EC9.jpeg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. TONYBRONX

    TONYBRONX Well-Known Member

  4. dchjr

    dchjr Well-Known Member

  5. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening


    Are you serious? lol
     
  6. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

  7. SchwaVB57

    SchwaVB57 Well-Known Member

  8. IBetASilverDollar

    IBetASilverDollar Well-Known Member

    Images aren't great and I wouldn't normally guess PL but I know you like PL coins and this date is common for PL coins (just sent a 65PL to GC to sell as it turns out) so I'll guess 64PL.
     
  9. Beefer518

    Beefer518 Well-Known Member

    I almost was going to say 65PL, but I think the chatter holds it back to a 64PL. Nice Morgan.
     
  10. dchjr

    dchjr Well-Known Member

    Just trying to get a raised brow! :angelic:
    Okay real guess MS 64. It looks like it still has good detail on the raised areas but the pictures show contact marks that IMO would lower the grade.
     
  11. TheFinn

    TheFinn Well-Known Member

    I would buy it as 63 P/L. NGC probably said 64 P/L.
     
  12. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    I will give a bigger hint, and say that they aren’t contact marks on the Obverse, left hand side in the fields. They are die polish striations, that did not photograph well.
     
  13. tpsadler

    tpsadler Numismatist

    MS64 if it were for a few marks on the Face this one would easily make a 65. Nice coin.
     
  14. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

  15. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    Based on the photos...I'm going to say straight graded MS64...no PL. Although the surfaces look absolutely stunning and it has booming luster, it doesn't appear to have the cameo affect that usually comes with a PL graded Morgan. Of course, that could also be the photo. I think the minor marks in the field hold it back from going any higher but it might have been given a bump to MS65 due to the eye appeal.

    Also, this looks to be a wonderful strike for a 1904-O. 1904-O Morgan's are known for a wide range of strike quality from fully struck to poorly struck and this is clearly a very nicely struck example.
     
  16. tpsadler

    tpsadler Numismatist

    I'm with you as far as getting a PL on this coin. But it is deceiving with those photos at this angle. IMO
     
  17. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    0016717A-040D-431F-9F7C-0299CBC872EC.jpeg Here is the coin. It is very close to PL. I think the obverse is PL, and the reverse is close to it. The pictures are bad, due to an overcast day, and I think the coin looks better in hand:
     
    longshot and dchjr like this.
  18. dchjr

    dchjr Well-Known Member

    Nice Morgan!
     
  19. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    I didn't even think NGC star. Had I thought it through and realized it was NGC prongs in the photo I would have said star for sure. Beautiful coin.
     
  20. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Thanks a lot. Had it been star PL, it would have had a pop of 5, instead of 93. :)
     
  21. Cascade

    Cascade CAC Grader, Founding Member

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page