Yes, exactly, right down to the obverse legend break... and I'll assume you're right about the RIC#! (@gsimonel got this too.) How did you know it was Constans?
Nice horse, jwt! Here's the reveal of the nymph: THESSALY. Larissa. Drachm 365-356 BC. Obv. Head of the nymph Larissa facing slightly left, with hair in ampyx. Rev. Horse to r., preparing to lie down; ΛAPIS-AIΩN above and below. Using the zumbly/TIF method to calculate book cost, this one set me back about $73. [Edit a few days later: make that $65, as I've found out more about the lot.] Not bad, I think. Full legend & almost full horse on the reverse (just missing a tiny bit of tail), and a nice style nymph. Honest wear, and I'm perfectly happy with it as a representative of this type in my collection. Keeper!
Bingo. This is more info than I had about this coin, thank you! I don't think mine is nicer than yours, but it is still pretty nice. Devilishly difficult to photograph, though, I will probably have another go at it sometime:
Yup. Some corrosion issues here, but it is a scarce coin so definitely not a dud. (Not sure I will keep it, though.)
Any ideas on this assortment? Was it someone's collection that got sold as a group lot or something a seller threw together? It does look like tons of fun!
Two thumbs up. You are very good on your Tacitus... I am sufficiently endowed with Tacitus that I may not keep this one. Tempting, though, for the very crisp reverse...
It is the same mint, as it turns out, and has a nice helmeted portrait I am pleased with (your consular one is also cool)... also pleased with the type, since I didn't have one. I especially like the globe of the heavens, with the clear lines marked. Keeper!
Wow, I am impressed!! Yes, this is right: the type is RIC 161, but the mintmark is like those of RIC 158 or 160. I hadn't noticed this, thank you! It must be a (rare?) transitional issue. Nice portrait and centering too. Definitely a keeper! (Besides, I only had Carinus as Augustus.)