Forum identifies this as the second issue of Otho, with "the most desirable portrait style" - others in this thread may disagree. I wish I could combine your obverse legends with my portrait.
As there are no known genuine roman mint bronzes of Otho, this might be the closest thing there is to a realistic portrait of his on a bronze coin, complete with SC and latin inscriptions: IMP M OTHO CAE AVG , laureate head of Otho right / large S C within laurel wreath Bronze As or 4 Chalkoi (?) Antiochia, February-April 69 RPC 4319 and plate 164 (6 specimens cited); McAlee (The Coins of Roman Antioch) 323; MBCG p. 177, 213 "nearly EF with excellent portrait" (according to David Sear)
Here my only one. A very ugly contribution, but still an Otho. Congrats to all! Awesome coins! AR Denarius - Rome mint- 69 AD. Obv: IMP M OTHO CAESAR AVG TRP Rev: PAX ORBIS TERRARVM RIC I 4, rare.
This coin has been one of the tougher for me to identify. All along I've thought it's Otho, but the lack of a legible legend is troublesome.
It looks like either Moneta holding scales and cornucopiae or Fortuna cornucopiae, the clue to which one is the legend on the left side of the reverse, you might be able to make out some letters.
Ah, Otho. Short reigns always interested me, but this one more than others because it was the toughest to fill in a (mixed AE and AR) 12 Caesars set. Others said Caligula would be the "stopper", but I found Otho much more challenging. I suppose it's a bit different if one is pursuing an all-silver 12C set. Here is the Otho I used to have (ex-HJB). Though relatively modest in grade, it was my favorite and best Roman coin for many years. I liked that it had Otho's name complete in the legends, and it was kind of neat how the slightly irregular shape of the flan happened to have followed the truncation line of the bust, as if it had been intentionally designed that way.