GTG: 1881CC Morgan

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

Images are too small for other than an estimate around MS63, but even in these the luster is striking.

 

Sorry about the images, did it from my phone and they didn't show up the normal size they do usually.

 

Maybe we should ban images taken by phones! It gets rather tedious when we get responses like (not you), "Sorry, it's the best I can do."

Chris

 

I'm with @SuperDave, from what I can tell from the images, I would be at MS-63.

 

I say 64 if it didn't get a details for the rim dings.

 

I'll guess 64, I don't think Bman would have bought this if it had a details grade. That is, assuming it's his.

 

I think the bag marks and hits put this one on the border between MS 62 and MS 63.
I'll go conservative and say it's an MS 62.

 

It's a PCGS 64 that I don't own. Got the pictures off Ebay. Someone else do another Morgan GTG!

 

CC's always get a bump. It's no better than 63, but it's probably in a 64 slab.

 

here's one of mine if you or others wanna take a stab:

 

I was going to say MS-64+; looked at it again and I'm going with:

MS-65+

The fields are nice and the contact marks on her cheek and jaw aren't too bad. Luster and Eye Appeal are great.

 

I am at a MS-66 on this. The luster is just spectacular and I love the frosty look with the gold toning around the rims. This is my kind of Morgan.

 

Surfaces look fairly clean and I'm between 65+ & 66...this time I'll go up and say MS 66

 

Going by the photo, the marks look like rubbing or friction instead of metal displacement so MS67.

This actually looks better than an 1881 S I had that was a MS67+.

 

I'm in the 65 camp

 

66

 

Well you kind of have an unfair advantage on this one since you shot this pic haha

 

Surely you aren't suggesting that he is muscling in on Ed's territory.