Hi all I have some coins that I think they might be undergrade . Please let me know what you all think ? Thanks
Can't really answer, because I can't tell what goes with what. The 1882-P, which doesn't seem to have a reverse image, looks closer to 62 than 64.
They look good to me. the 84 cc MS63 has major acne on the face, the 82 MS64 looks good, now the 82 CC might get a bump if re-graded.
The last 3 look good. the 21 peace gets graded tough due to the high profile. MS 62 looks good. They are all very nice coins and you should be proud to own them.
I agree with the others that they all look to be properly graded. A few key marks keep a bunch of these out of the next grade, like the MS-64 1882-CC. The 1887 MS 64 is in a highly collectible PCGS Doily holder. The holder alone will make that coin worth more than the same coin in MS 65. Do not crack it or regrade it (it also happens to be the correct grade at 64, in my opinion). As is, I believe it would sell on ebay for $140-$200.
Much betterer. I still believe the 1882-P to be overgraded, but IMO the 1921 Peace deserved better than it got. The 1884-CC might possibly do a grade better on resubmission, but I'd hold it as-is in the older slab. The others, give or take, are pretty fairly graded. The 1921-D is a VAM-1J, an interesting Middle Die State version with the noted collar clash above RIBU. Only the late die state, where the die break over TAT on the reverse becomes full, is added value but all the same it's one of the more interesting 1921-D varieties and I'd personally consider it a welcome addition to the collection.
