I think the ear looks good but trust looks like deterioration to me if you flip your picture Chris will be able to really tell you he's really good at it
I believe that I mentioned before that I've used one form of drafting and/or AutoCAD for 58 years or so. My "mind's eye" still works very well, thank you. Chris
Haha. I am working on getting you a better photo. If anyone needs to rotate the image and you are using a Windows PC just hold down CTRL and ALT at the same time and then hit your left, right, or down arrow to see it rotate
Thanks a lot. I hope your mother runs out from under the porch and bites you for making me flip my entire computer upside down and sideways! Kidding, neat tip. Ear looks doubled to me.
I couldn't find a 1994d doubled die ear lobes on line to compare this one to...die marks etc... are there any?... I have an image of the 1994d... to me, they look the same in the ear lobe area...hope I'm wrong...
Take too many more pictures and post the better useful ones, maybe it just took a hit. I don't see a 94D DDO with the earlobe doubled yet attributed. I may have overlooked a source or two.
Your posts are confusing in that I'm not sure all your pictures are of the same coin or you've mixed in a different one for comparison. Pix in posts 1 and 8 seem to indicate being the same coin. Not sure about posts 10 and 11 because of the language in post 10 and orange v red color. Looks like you may have been doing better with your loupe if you could try it from multiple rotational index points having the ear focused instead of non-relevant parts of the coin.
Sorry, caught the mistakes in my post. The two images I posted are of the same coin, one just a little closer. I was only comparing these images of an ordinary 1994d to the original OP pic. To me the ones I posted, (normal) look the same as the OP. Sorry for the confusion... Is this a first doubled die ear for 1994d?
Two people posted two different coins. Looks like the first guy posted the picture, the second guy wanted to find what the first guy found and thought he found what the first guy posted, so he posted a picture of his find, that resembles the first persons post. At first I thought you were talking to the same guy, but quick look at the names, and found they are two different ppl.
All those guys who look alike look alike to me. You'd laugh if you were here about some of the ghettofabulous and quite crass expletives I let fly. Thanks, you made me do that.
I don't follow, just have to be paying attention. It's clear you think we all the same lol but what do you expect from the internet? Seriously dude I see you ramble on and on about the picture this the picture that, I view that as cookie cutter myself. It's okay ordinary fool, we all have cookie cutter mentality because we all have to learn from each other. It's not like you know everything under the sun about a good photo for no reason. I like a person who can spot mistakes, someone whose paying attention! You couldn't see that you were talking to two people. No wonder you can't see stuff, I've had people give me answers, even without being able to see the picture clearly, that's why you see a lot of these websites with picture less variety lists. Sometimes you only need the description and an alright photo to determine it. Not poking fun at you or anything just sharing my thoughts lol there been many people who could still answer, by giving me a variety list that could resemble description. If you want to help people get better pictures give them a better camera. But seriously, you give a mile long description of "your photo sucks, take a new picture" you are like the biggest cookie cut to all the cookie cutters haha.
No, I really don't have to study very similar looking poster avatars. Who would hijack such a post and not clearly announce what they are doing much less with language that makes it even more unclear? So whatever, and yes, most of your pix are at best, poor.
