2 X 1881 S Morgans GTG's

I picked these two up today GTG on each.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

I'll go:
1. MS65
2. MS64 with a bump for toning.

 

66 and 65

 

PCI toners are some of my faves !!!
Im jealous !!!

 

The PCGS Rattler is probably labeled MS-64, but I would put it as a lock 65 today.

The PCI has some really cool toning. I bet it's labeled a 65.

Nice looking coins, they look like the types I like to come across.

 

65, and maybe better.
65.
Love 'em.

 

I'm gonna say first one labeled a 64 even though based on pictures could be as high as 66. Second one gonna say 65 and love the look!

 

65 on the label of #1, 66 today.

65 on the label of #2,

 

66
64 (perhaps with a plus).

Nice ones, Paddy!

 

the toned one is an 14 A vam a R 5 coin

 

66 (I can't see a single flaw)
64 (would earn a NGC star for being stunningly beautiful)

 

PCGS--》65...could be a 66 today
PCI--》64...that one mark to the left of the nose keeps it out of a 65/66 holder

Both are tremendous looking Morgans!

 

66
65

Nice ones

 

66
65

 

The two post are the very reasons you never pay attention to the writing on the slab!
I went through 3 boxes of slabs and pulled out these two. I had also picked out 2 H-10's . However it was now down to a choice.I didn't have enough $ for the half dimes and the Morgan's . Well that was a hard choice for a half dime collector . However the odds of the half dimes still being there when I return and these two.....we're in my favor .
I will post the grades later this evening . I think I did very well

 

66--#1
65+--#2. Both are beautiful coins.

 

ms65 (today 66 or 65+)
ms63 (nice color, lots of chatter)

Nice Morgan's!

 

Well here's the grades..... shocked? Buy the coin not the slab here's why.
@SuperDave

 

Wow. If that rattler doesn't gold bean I'd fly to NJ and confront JA in person about how such a travesty could occur!