I was thinking the exact same thing! "Tiny bubbles on the cent makes me feel sappy makes me feel spent." Chris
Here's one from wexler site . 1982 1¢ WDDR-001 Description: Strong extra thickness shows on USA, EPU, the designer’s initials, and ONE. Separation lines are visible on AMERICA and the D in UNITED. Die Markers: Obverse: Small Date Zinc. A die scratch runs north from the upper left of the I in LIBERTY. Reverse: Heavy E/W die scratches run NNW/SSE through the statue of Lincoln. A die gouge (dot) can be found to the right of the upper T in CENT. Two die gouges can be found below the right side of the N in ONE. Submitted By: Peter Beane Cross References: None known
Doesn't matter, wexler doesn't list the die state of his . Could be yours is a early die state, then the one wexler has showing ..
OK, you already knew my answer. So what's your real question ? Would it affect the grade in the opinion of the TPGs ? According to their own standards, it may even prevent the coin from getting a grade - 93|N-3 Planchet Flaw - Metal impurity or defect in the planchet – depends on severity Given that a defective planchet, (and there's no doubt that's what this is, a defective planchet), can even prevent a coin from grading at all, there's no way that a defective planchet CANNOT affect the grade. So their answer has to be the same as mine - a definite yes. The question then becomes how much ? And you guys know as well as I do that their vagaries are unknowable, so there's no way to even guess with any degree of accuracy. As for me, well, I think I'd call the '82 a 62 and the '87 no grade as its issues pretty much cover the entire coin.
It may be a planchet defect, but shouldn't be a reason to not get a slab. I have a few in great shape. I think zinc showing from the strike, is more volatile that plating blisters. The 87' deserves at least an AU58
There is one thing and only one thing that ever makes a coin, any coin, AU - and that is wear. Things like contact marks, hits, dings, hairlines, minor scratches - a coin can literally be covered with them and that coin will still be considered MS, and justly so. It is only when a coin has wear that the grade of a coin is lowered below MS. There are however many things that can make a coin ungradeable - and that means no grade at all. Here is a list of them. 82 Filed Rims Rim(s) and/or edge is filed. 83 Peeling Lamination Potential for sealing damage. 84 Holed and/or Plugged Any filled or non-filled hole. 86 No Opinion – our experts are unable to determine a coin’s authenticity – fee not refunded 87 Not Eligible For Service Selected – the coin is too valuable for the chosen service level – fee refunded 90 Questionable Authenticity – the coin is most likely a counterfeit. 91|N-1 Questionable/Artificial Toning (or Questionable Color for copper) 92|N-2 Cleaned – surface damage due to a harsh, abrasive cleaning 93|N-3 Planchet Flaw - Metal impurity or defect in the planchet – depends on severity 94|N-4 Altered Surface - Whizzed, harsh cleaning, thumbed over (using a pasty substance to cover defects or alter the appearance). 95|N-5 Scratch - depends on the severity of the scratch. Rim dent. 96|N-6 No Service – coins we do not certify (i.e. medals, some privately made issues, etc.) or cannot certify (i.e. over-sized coins) 97|N-7 Environmental Damage – i.e. corrosion, coating (lacquer), excessively heavy toning, etc. 98|N-8 Damage – deliberate surface damage, i.e. graffiti, spot(s) removed, etc. – depends on severity 99|N-9 PVC (Poly-Vinyl-Chloride) – a plasticizer used to produce vinyl that will leach out of the holder and onto the coin, eventually damaging the surfaces. Now these things that make a coin ungradeable were not defined or established by the TPGs, they were defined and established, and accepted by the numismatic community as being valid reasons for making a coin ungradeable long before the TPGs ever existed. And if one wishes to disagree with these principles, well, that's up to the individual I guess. But if you do, then you at least must give some consideration as to determining what standards you do grade coins by.
I don't disagree with the principles, In fact, only had to see him once in middle school. It was all I needed, he set a 3/8" thick 3' long ruler on the desk, though it was smaller than the one my Dad used. But to get the coin back to Au 58, this toning doesn't happen in a Mint set. It came from circulation. The gassy planchet unless I missed it doesn't have a break in the Copper. Unless the bubbles have happened since the coin left the mint, it should deserve a strait grade.