The coin in the photo reads BIP . I or year ten making it a year newer rather than older. On what date did Antioch change to a new year? Alexanderia usually used 29 August but I don't recall seeing that information on Antioch.
Nice Tet, and I agree. It looks much better out of the slab. btw, what do you have against a fat Nero?
This http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/NERO-DENARIUS-ROMAN-COIN-/132131271049 I dont know, the worn ones just look weird. This one looks like he has a tumor on his neck lol.
Nice Tet, well done crackin' that out! Kinda like pistachios..."let's get crackin'! " Nero-Dude: RI Nero AR Tetradrachm 54-68 CE Eagle Some wives...: RImp Octavia Augusta AE 27 7.6g 54-62 CE m Nero Thrace Perinthus Hera Samos RPC 1755 RI Poppea-Nero BI tetradrachm of Alexandria LI yr10 63-64AD Milne 217 RPC 5275
Here's a very youthful portrait on an Alexandrian tet of the man: 12.49 g; 23.8 mm NEΡΩ KΛAY KAIS SEBA GEP AYTO, laureate bust right ΠΡΟΝ ΝΕΟΥ ΣΕΒΑΣΤΟΥ, emperor seated left on throne with feet on a step-stool, holding patera and scepter; LE to left = year 5 = 58/59 AD. Milne 181; Curtis 112, Emmett 120
Nice coin, I have been working a large group of Antioch for a client, hardly any silver, mostly bronze. They can be very challenging as the bronzes circulated heavily in the area. One thing about doing something like this with a large group (some 300 plus coins) is that you see a huge variety and styles. I'll be taking some images and look forward to sharing with the group.
I didn't, but others here on CT questioned it. So, I sent it off to David Sear for authentication. Mr. Sear said it was most definitely a fake.
I see it is definitely a good fake I really didnt imagine it to be fake. What do you think of this one? I am buying it but hope its genuine.
I don't know and any guess I might have would not be worth a hill of beans since I bought the fake in the first place. Perhaps someone else here will give their opinion.