Would you ever buy a "details" grade coin?

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by The Meat man, Sep 13, 2026 at 1:03 PM.

?

Would you buy a "details" coin?

  1. No, I would never buy one under any circumstances.

    5 vote(s)
    15.2%
  2. Only when I cannot afford a straight-graded coin.

    14 vote(s)
    42.4%
  3. Only when I don't want to (even if I technically can) spend the extra $$ on a straight-graded coin.

    5 vote(s)
    15.2%
  4. Don't care either way.

    8 vote(s)
    24.2%
  5. I only buy "details" coins.

    1 vote(s)
    3.0%
  1. Troodon

    Troodon Coin Collector

    I mean, I personally only care about collecting what I like, and don't care in the least what the coins will be worth at some point in the future, as I don't intend on selling them if I can help it. So ultimately what I buy I judge purely on a pass/fail basis. I try to aim for the nicest example of something I can reasonably afford, and "details" if it's not that bad of a detail to my eye can bring the price down considerably, and allow me to afford something I otherwise couldn't. So no big complaints with it I suppose.
     
    KBBPLL, The Meat man and imrich like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. johnmilton

    johnmilton Well-Known Member

    I would never buy a “details” grade coin in a holder. I have bought such items raw if they were extremely cheap, like well under $100. I have a rusted CSA Virginia token which was made from iron recovered from the armored part of the ship. It’s a terrible token, but it is a relic and a piece of history, but it’s only such item in my collection.

    A nice one now costs over $3,000. The trouble is it can go bad in the holder. A few years ago, a well known token and medal dealer had a certified example in an auction. He was receiving the expected bids for it when he noticed that it was rusting. He let those who had bid withdraw their offers. It sold for just under $2,000. I would not have bought for anything close to that, given the developing problem. As long as it was in the holder, there was nothing you could do about it.

    The trouble with “details coins” is that they will always be a problem. The value on straight graded coins might rise considerably, but when you have a problem piece, it will always be a “yes, but” situation. My general approach has long been, if I can’t afford a decent example of something, I don’t own it.
     
    JoshuaP, imrich and The Meat man like this.
  4. imrich

    imrich Well-Known Member

    I really have appreciated your beautiful collection, but I search for problems in life that it's believed I have a solution which can be passed to others.
    I've been very lucky in my choices!
     
    The Meat man and johnmilton like this.
  5. KBBPLL

    KBBPLL Well-Known Member

    I think it falls under “have to have one, not patient enough to wait possibly years for a problem free coin, willing to settle.”
     
  6. Barberian

    Barberian Junior Member Supporter

    I have generally avoided purchasing details coins. However, when I started collecting seated Liberty half dollars, my goal was to fill a Dansco with coins that would straight grade, yet the tougher dates were difficult to find raw with original toning that would straight grade. I purchased an 1855-S and 1878-CC raw off eBay that I had hopes would straight grade but were later graded as VF details - cleaned. I recently replaced the 1878-CC VF details with a PCGS VG8 example. I'm still looking for a TPG straight graded 1855-S.

    I do cherry pick 1855/54 seated halves mislabeled as "1855" in details holders if the price is low enough and they are graded by one of the leading TPG services. I have mislabeled examples from PCGS (4), NGC, ANACS, and ICG. I haven't seen a mislabeled CACG example yet, but I haven't been looking for overdates lately. CACG graded and mislabeled 1855/54s are likely out there. Here are a few examples. All are 1855/54s that were mislabeled as 1855 normal dates.

    PCGS AU-details "1855" from eBay

    1855 over 54 AU det..jpg
    1855 over 54 in PCGS AU-det. for 1855.jpg

    PCGS Fine-details "1855" from Heritage Auctions
    1855 over 54 HA 251222 slab photo.jpg

    PCGS VF35 "1855" purchased off eBay and cherry picked from my collection. When submitted to PCGS, PCGS ignored the proper date label "1855/54" and coin number ("6282") that I provided on my submission form and changed this an "1855" and "6281." PCGS Customer Service and graders said they attributed it properly. It is not a details coin but I added it here because I am still angry over their gross incompetence and their inability to admit they made a mistake.

    Incorrect 55ov54 cert page.jpg

    ANACS EF-details damaged, cleaned "1855" off eBay
    1855 over 854.14 eBay cherry14 slab.png

    NGC Fine-details "1855" from Great Collections
    1855 over 854.24 slab obverse.jpg

    ICG VG8 "1855" (straight graded) off eBay - I added this straight graded coin as an example of a mislabel from ICG.

    1855 over 854.9 ICG VG8 eBay cherry9 both sides.jpg
     
    Last edited: Sep 14, 2026 at 11:06 AM
    longarm, KBBPLL and imrich like this.
  7. messydesk

    messydesk Well-Known Member

    It depends on how bad the problem is and how realistic obtaining a problem-free coin is. There's one coin that is in a details holder that I'm waiting to appear on the market. If it does and the stars align just right, it'll be my most expensive coin.
     
    samclemens3991 likes this.

Share This Page