Yeah or Nea?

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Rushmore, Sep 11, 2026 at 11:46 PM.

  1. Rushmore

    Rushmore Coin Addict

    kountryken and SensibleSal66 like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    It's a PASS for me. Bad condition plus you can't tell that it's an 1872.
     
  4. Mr. Numismatist

    Mr. Numismatist Strawberry Token Enthusiast

    Looks more like an 1873 or 1878.
     
    kountryken, Muzyck, KBBPLL and 3 others like this.
  5. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    I think the price is to high for the poor grade. I would hold off for a nicer coin in better condition even if it cost more.
     
    kountryken and SensibleSal66 like this.
  6. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan Eclectic numismatist Moderator

    While I won't address the price (it could be OK considering the coin is a better date), I'd definitely hold out for a problem free example, even if in lower grade.

    That being said, it doesn't look totally awful. It's entirely up to you what you consider acceptable (or not) for your own collection.
     
    kountryken and SensibleSal66 like this.
  7. Spark1951

    Spark1951 Accomplishment, not Activity

    Nay. Too low ball for me.

    NGC has it listed PrAg for $80.00 so it seems like a good price/deal.

    I would like/be happy over the price for this keydate, but I think I would be unhappy with the coin.
     
    kountryken and SensibleSal66 like this.
  8. dwhiz

    dwhiz Collector Supporter

    I would need to see it in person, hard to tell the date.
     
    kountryken likes this.
  9. Barney McRae

    Barney McRae Supporter! Supporter

    i agree. Enlarged it looks a dead ringer for 1878.
     
    kountryken and dwhiz like this.
  10. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    For a key date, I'd want the date to be clear enough that there is no doubt.
     
    kountryken likes this.
  11. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    Might look better in hand but the pic says no thanks.
     
    kountryken likes this.
  12. BRandM

    BRandM Counterstamp Collector

    I wouldn't touch it either. The date is "iffy" and condition very poor. It's your choice though so go for it if you like it.

    Bruce
     
    kountryken likes this.
  13. kountryken

    kountryken Well-Known Member

    I have bought coins in similar condition as "hole fillers" until I could find a better one. If I didn't find a better one, then I, at least had one. I agree with the others that this looks a lot like a 1878. But, the worn 2 can look like an 8. In hand you may be able to read the date better? Like has been pointed out, it's what you are happy with. I totally understand having a tight budget. But, I would try my best to make sure the date is legible. If there is a return option, you could buy it, and if the date wasn't good enough, return it. But, check out the return policy very carefully. Sometimes the return gets expensive. Bottom line is, do you like it enough to maybe have it for a very long time? Can you increase your budget enough to get a better one? The one that needs to be happy with the purchase is you.
     

Share This Page