GTG: Jefferson Nickel Edition

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by No_Ragrets, Aug 24, 2026 at 9:06 PM.

?

GTG

This poll will close on Aug 31, 2026 at 9:06 PM.
  1. MS66

    3 vote(s)
    33.3%
  2. MS65

    5 vote(s)
    55.6%
  3. MS64

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. MS63

    1 vote(s)
    11.1%
  5. MS62

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  6. MS61

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  7. MS60

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  8. AU58

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  9. Full steps

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  10. "+" Designation

    1 vote(s)
    11.1%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. No_Ragrets

    No_Ragrets Self-proclaimed Semi-Amateur Numismatist Supporter

    Howdy doody folks! I thought I'd share this here as a GTG to see what yous all think of it. Let er rip, and reveal in about 48 hours! Good luck!

    59486905_large.jpg 20260824_201931.jpg 20260824_201949.jpg 20260824_202011.jpg 20260824_202013.jpg 20260824_202022.jpg 20260824_202025.jpg 20260824_202031.jpg 20260824_202053~3.jpg 20260824_202106.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    MS 66 ...not full steps
    ...attractive looking coin that is relatively clean and has some solid eye appeal which could push it up from a technical 65 at PCGS
     
    dwhiz, Mr.Q and No_Ragrets like this.
  4. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    MS65. A few obverse "ticks", but otherwise very handsome coin if I may say so. :)
     
    No_Ragrets, dwhiz and Mr.Q like this.
  5. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    MS-63. Incomplete steps, dull dome lines, shallow frontage behind columns. Other than these small issues a very nice coin. I would not pass it up congrats.
     
  6. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    I was at 66 when I saw it.
     
    No_Ragrets, dwhiz and SensibleSal66 like this.
  7. Mr. Numismatist

    Mr. Numismatist Strawberry Token Enthusiast

    The luster is good, but definitely not enough to be anything above a 66. I think it has just a few too many contact marks for a 66, but just barely. That combined with the somewhat above average eye appeal, I'm guessing MS-65+, no FS.
     
    No_Ragrets, dwhiz and SensibleSal66 like this.
  8. Spark1951

    Spark1951 Accomplishment, not Activity

    I think it graded MS65, definitely not FS. This is how I think PCGS would grade for this year.

    But I agree with @Mr.Q that it has weakly defined structure in the reverse-center, and personally think it should grade MS63 too. I wouldn’t grade it higher if all of the design is not there (weak strike?).

    The rest of the coin reflects MS elements and it has superb luster. I don’t know what secret parameter PCGS uses to account for the obvious lack of detail in the center of the reverse. IMO.
     
    No_Ragrets and dwhiz like this.
  9. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    MS-65, not FS. Very nice looking and the color makes you look twice at it.
     
    No_Ragrets, dwhiz and SensibleSal66 like this.
  10. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan Eclectic numismatist Moderator

    Ditto.
     
    No_Ragrets and dwhiz like this.
  11. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan Eclectic numismatist Moderator

    PS- those hints of color are lovely.
     
    No_Ragrets and dwhiz like this.
  12. dwhiz

    dwhiz Collector Supporter

    Nice Jeff 65 no FS
     
    No_Ragrets likes this.

Share This Page