These are cellphone photos, not professional shots, so we're working within those limitations, here. The coin is mostly white, with the peripheral toning you see, and some decent luster which doesn’t entirely show in these images.
Being conservative, and based on these photos, if I was seeing this coin blind, in someone else’s GTG thread, I’d likely guess one point lower than the actual grade (so that's how I voted in the poll, pretending I didn't know the answer). The fact that the luster doesn’t entirely come through is a factor in that. Edit: here is an admittedly low-quality GIF to show the luster somewhat.
I voted MS64 before seeing the GIF. I thought I saw meaningful marks on the coin, but they don't detract . . . I think it's more likely an MS65.
Seeing the luster (at least imperfectly in the GIF) does make a difference, I reckon. In hand, it's a bright beauty.
The CoinTalk consensus so far is running a bit higher than that in the parallel thread on Collectors Universe. But some people over there have guessed correctly. (Spoiler): So far, nobody here has (including myself, because I pretended not to know the answer and graded my poll vote like I would have guessed if I saw these pics in someone else’s poll.) But the poll only has six votes as of this typing.
After the GIF I, too, changed to MS65. It likely graded MS63, but the GIF illustrates the luster. Very nice!…Spark
This is a tough one! Strike - nothing to write home about, but not terrible. 3 out of 5 Luster - in the pictures, not seeing a lot. The gif looks like it has decent luster. 4 out of 5 Eye appeal - that dipped and retoned look is not for me, but it isn't bad. 3 out of 5 Contact marks - first off I'll say, I'm not detecting any wear in the pictures or the gif. I don't think it's AU based on what I'm seeing. One the one hand, I'm not seeing a large number of contact marks - but on the other, I'm interpreting many of the "shiny spots" in the pictures as marks. 3.5 out of 5? It is nearly impossible to accurately grade the coin with the information provided, so I'll really just give a 63-64? I voted 63 in the poll.
Thanks for that detailed analysis, and sorry my mediocre photog skills weren’t quite up to the challenges presented by this one.
Here is my reasoning for voting 63. In the first pictures I could not see any wear, the gif showed the luster all over the coin. I was going to vote 64, but you said "some decent luster" - so I down I went with 63 instead of 64. The gif made me think 64 and what I was going to vote. And your pictures are better than anything I can do.
MS 63 ....from the pictures I figured there were some bigger hits on the neck and cheek, such that it could be a 62; the gif made me think it is nicer than I originally thought so I bumped it up a point to 63...I still think it needs to show stronger luster and be cleaner to get to 64 or higher (but I might be completely misjudging it)
I don't know. The looping video screams a MS65 to me. Nice coin. Like to see more pics, if not too much trouble.