Guess The Grade 1908 St. Gaudens $20 Double Eagle

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Mr. Numismatist, Jun 3, 2026 at 7:54 PM.

?

Guess the Grade

  1. AU-53

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. AU-55

    6.7%
  3. AU-58

    40.0%
  4. MS-61

    13.3%
  5. MS-62

    6.7%
  6. MS-63

    6.7%
  7. MS-64

    13.3%
  8. MS-65

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  9. MS-66

    13.3%
  10. MS-67

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. The Meat man

    The Meat man Supporter! Supporter

    Wow! Can't believe I was closer than most. I was one of the votes for MS66.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    I figured it might be a high grade given the lack of contact marks. The areas I thought were rub must not be rub and maybe a slab shot or video that showed more luster would be more convincing of the grade.
     
  4. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    The contact will remain the question u nless seen in hand.
     
  5. GoldFinger1969

    GoldFinger1969 Supporter! Supporter

    Yup....what is all that discoloration on the high points like on the knee ? :confused:

    But no contact marks, absolutely correct.
     
    Mr. Numismatist and ddddd like this.
  6. mpcusa

    mpcusa "Official C.T. TROLL SWEEPER"

    a 67 WOW !! that,s generous !! there appears to be obvious imperfection midway up the torch but again grading isnt an exact science...LOL
     
    Mr. Numismatist likes this.
  7. mpcusa

    mpcusa "Official C.T. TROLL SWEEPER"

    Here’s the grade on the one I submitted as a comparison IMG_0766.jpeg
     
    Mr. Numismatist likes this.
  8. GoldFinger1969

    GoldFinger1969 Supporter! Supporter

    I've seen/read about many coins that were originally MS (admittedly I recall only up to MS-65 not higher) that were then graded by CACG and got shot down to AU-58 by JA's minions. Rub or wear or friction...on HIGH points.

    Could even an MS-67 be misgraded ? I wonder.
     
    mpcusa likes this.

Share This Page