Prepping another PCGS submission

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by No_Ragrets, Jun 2, 2026 at 6:52 PM.

  1. No_Ragrets

    No_Ragrets Self-proclaimed Semi-Amateur Numismatist Supporter

    Now, I'm not one to play the crack-out-and-resubmit game, but as well as CACG did for me on other submissions, I was not happy with this one. It's my first coin that I'm actually going forward with breaking free from captivity solely to resubmit. Here's one of a handful of coins going in, but the only one [hopefully] destined for an upgrade. 1883 V Nickel with cents.

    20260602_083009.jpg 20260602_083019.jpg 20260602_084400.jpg 20260602_103217.jpg 20260602_103257.jpg 20260602_103308.jpg

    I feel that CACG did me dirty on this coin, grading it as a MS61. I'm not entirely sure still, but I'm leaning towards submitting this as a proof coin, JD-1 variety. From what I've seen so far, the doubling inside the bottom loop of the 3 is a pup for this variety. And there's clear die polishing lines that go underneath the devices, as well as highly reflective fields.

    20260602_083136.jpg

    I'm just crossing my fingers that I didn't goof by cutting this out. Typically, whenever I free a coin from a holder, it's specifically for my 7070. At least if it comes back body-bagged, I'll have an upgrade coin for my type set. But this time is different... I want to get more eyes on this, and see what the next TPG says. Wish me luck!
     
    Mr.Q, Dima, Vess1 and 3 others like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. dwhiz

    dwhiz Collector Supporter

    Wow, good luck, I hope it works out.
     
    No_Ragrets likes this.
  4. Vess1

    Vess1 CT SP VIP Supporter

    Always an interesting experiment but best case scenario I don't believe it will upgrade enough to make up for the grading fees. What do you feel is best case scenario? Would have to jump to a 64 to gain $100 of value. Luster plays a role. 12 to 6 o'clock fields are too busy to be much over low MS IMHO. This ones mine in my type set. NGC gave it a 64.
    3228959_Full_Obv.jpg
    3228959_Full_Rev.jpg
     
    No_Ragrets likes this.
  5. mpcusa

    mpcusa "Official C.T. TROLL SWEEPER"

    They really beat you up on that one, but CACG is a pretty tough service.
     
    No_Ragrets likes this.
  6. No_Ragrets

    No_Ragrets Self-proclaimed Semi-Amateur Numismatist Supporter

    I submitted it to CACG as a proof but didn't know anything about the JD-1 variety. After a bit of Google searches, I saw that the variety mentioned (JD-1, for a proof coin) has slight doubling inside 3. Mine has this trait, and incredibly reflective fields. If it's truly a business strike, it's the nicest I've ever seen.

    So, to answer your question, my goal is to submit for grading as a proof, but with being able to mention why I believe it is, too. If I'm wrong, then so be it, and I'll either leave it as-is, sell it, or cut it out for my 7070. But I still have a few days before I ship, so it's not set in stone yet... aside from it being raw now, that is.
     
  7. No_Ragrets

    No_Ragrets Self-proclaimed Semi-Amateur Numismatist Supporter

    I knew they were strict before joining, but I didn't think they'd be so harsh lol! Giving that a 61 when it looks how it does just seemed like a slap to the face kinda
     
  8. Barney McRae

    Barney McRae Supporter! Supporter

    Isn't there an option to do a crossover with a minimum grade and/or designation you request, if not, they just return it as is and just charge you a grading fee? Oops! :D I totally get it if you don't want built in bias of a previously graded coin however.
     
    No_Ragrets likes this.
  9. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    CAC is not worth the Bean; they seldom make mistakes but seldom still means they do in my opinion.
     
    No_Ragrets likes this.

Share This Page