More eBay shins.......

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Barney McRae, May 4, 2026 at 5:23 PM.

  1. Barney McRae

    Barney McRae Supporter! Supporter

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Randy Abercrombie

    Randy Abercrombie Supporter! Supporter

    Don't you just love the honest little old man avatar.
     
    Barney McRae likes this.
  4. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    No mint mark is okay, it's a P for Philadelphia. Nice Morgan.
     
  5. AdamL

    AdamL Well-Known Member

    I'm wondering if something is going on with the auction, or maybe bids got cancelled. But the high big just changed multiple times while I was looking at it. For a few minutes it showed a high bid of 1 dollar even though there are 32 bids. Right now it's showing that it's back over $200
     
  6. AdamL

    AdamL Well-Known Member

    Now this: Screenshot (293).png
     
    Barney McRae likes this.
  7. calcol

    calcol Supporter! Supporter

    So, is this a worn proof, altered mint mark or outright fake?
     
  8. Randy Abercrombie

    Randy Abercrombie Supporter! Supporter

    That’s 100% bogus. That’s a certified Shanghai mint Morgan and has never remotely been a proof Philly.
     
  9. Sting 60

    Sting 60 Well-Known Member

    There is a few things that I suspect are not right. The date is not right, never heard of a closed 5. The m in unum is almost filled. The denticles from 6 to 7 are a give away that this is a cast most likely. The reverse was done a bit better but over all the fields are pretty rough. I always wonder that a coin this rare, why hasn't it been certified. Mike.
     
    Heavymetal likes this.
  10. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    After @Sting 60 remark I decided to do some research, I found that he is not only correct but also there was O and S only, no plain 1895 Morgan. My mistake, sorry people.
     
  11. Sting 60

    Sting 60 Well-Known Member

    You are correct Sir, so this would have to have been a proof, which none were ever circulated. That is why a mentioned the rarity. Mike.
     
  12. calcol

    calcol Supporter! Supporter

    Although no circulation strikes are known, quite a few 1895 proofs were circulated. Some have graded 10 or below. Mike
     
    Barney McRae likes this.
  13. fretboard

    fretboard Defender of Old Coinage!

    Horrible looking Morgan, surprised it got any bids at all! :cigar:
     
    dwhiz likes this.
  14. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    I have a 95 that someone removed the mint mark. Cost me $7.50.
    Always wondered if they actually thought it would fool someone.
     
  15. JoshuaP

    JoshuaP Well-Known Member

    Is there a way by die markers to determine if it is either S or O?
     
  16. Barney McRae

    Barney McRae Supporter! Supporter

    There were very few 1895P Morgans ever made and ALL were proofs. This was NEVER a proof. It's got to be fake, and I'm no expert.
     
  17. Barney McRae

    Barney McRae Supporter! Supporter

    You beat me to it. This is why I immediately knew it was counterfeit besides looking very odd. Even circulated, it would still have a bit of a cameo.
     
    calcol and Pickin and Grinin like this.
  18. Barney McRae

    Barney McRae Supporter! Supporter

    At the time I posted this, there were 54 bids I think. Looks like a lot of bids got retracted. :p It could have been just one single bidder or several.
     
    AdamL likes this.
  19. Barney McRae

    Barney McRae Supporter! Supporter

    Maybe Jack Young will stop by and check out the die pairs. WAY above my pay grade.
     
    JoshuaP likes this.
  20. Barney McRae

    Barney McRae Supporter! Supporter

    I did go back and look at the bid history this morning. 4 different bidders retracted their multiple bids. Maybe they were from here and read this thread before hammer time.:D
     
    AdamL likes this.

Share This Page