MS or AU? 1916-D Wheat Cent

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Mr. Numismatist, Mar 23, 2026 at 10:00 PM.

  1. Mr. Numismatist

    Mr. Numismatist Strawberry Token Enthusiast

    I was doing guess the grade on MyCollect to sharpen my grading skills and I came across the coin below. I guessed it was AU-58, but turns out it was graded MS-64. It really looks worn to me on Lincoln's beard and cheek. What do you think?

    1916-D Cent.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    I am a little more lenient than you on this one. I am a 58 on this one. The luster is still full just a little dull. That cheek and jaw is just the strike. Luster is even for the coin.
     
  4. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    Gauge on E and N in CENT, slight gauge on nose, scratches in field on both sides. Otherwise, mid to high AU in my opinion, nice coin thanks for sharing.
     
  5. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    AU to me but a very nice looking coin.
     
  6. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan Eclectic numismatist Moderator

    I can see why one would go Choice AU on that one (I probably would have, myself), but I suppose there's an issue of soft strike there that the TPG took into account, maybe?

    That, or it was a Monday morning and the graders hadn't had their coffee yet.

    It's a good looking coin, regardless.
     
  7. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    Right on the border of AU58- MS60. Really sharp Lincoln cent! ;)
     
  8. Long Beard

    Long Beard Well-Known Member

    I feel they got it right. The reverse wheat stalks are the primary reason, the obverse seems a bit weak (later die strike) but also within an MS64BN grade.
     
  9. Spark1951

    Spark1951 Accomplishment, not Activity

    We may never know why it got a MS64, but late die strike or no it appears to be AU58. Both sides look slightly worn.

    One other thing I see is a multitude of micro contact marks on both sides, which to me points at either slight circulation or mishandling.
     
  10. robec

    robec Junior Member

    I’d have to go AU.
     
    Mr. Numismatist likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page