1812 Capped Bust Half Dollar 1812/1 ? Something under the 2

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Brett_in_Sacto, Mar 6, 2017.

  1. Brett_in_Sacto

    Brett_in_Sacto Well-Known Member

    My "whole coin" pictures are fuzzy, but there's enough under the 2 in the date to make me ask questions.

    Thoughts?

    20170301_163309.jpg 20170301_163306_001.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. SchwaVB57

    SchwaVB57 Well-Known Member

    Is it a large or small 8? You could have the 2 over 1!
     
  4. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    That does not look like the overdate to me at all.
     
  5. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    Show us the whole coin and even fuzzy, we may be able to i.d. the Overton for you.
     
    Last edited: Mar 6, 2017
  6. Brett_in_Sacto

    Brett_in_Sacto Well-Known Member

  7. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    Let's see........0? No! 1? No! 2? No! 3? No! 4? No! 5? No! 6? No! 7? No! 8? No! 9? No! Maybe the number is in Arabic.

    Chris
     
  8. SchwaVB57

    SchwaVB57 Well-Known Member

    If a large 8 and 2 over 1, $2500.00 plus. I cannot tell from the pictures, something there, but nothing like over date pictures published.
     
  9. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    not the overdate
     
  10. SuperDave

    SuperDave Free the Cartwheels!

    Neither of the two overdates manifest themselves in that location; another explanation will be required. :)

    As a quick hint usable with these pics, both O-101 and O-102 appear to have the vertical shaft of the second 1 roughly centered over the space between denticles. That digit here appears to be centered over a denticle itself. A similar discrepancy exists with the location of the left point of the 2 on this coin; on both known varieties that point is adjacent to a denticle space at the left end of a denticle.
     
  11. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    Using only that picture, I'm about 80% sure this is the O-107.
     
  12. Brett_in_Sacto

    Brett_in_Sacto Well-Known Member

    The top of the underlying mark does look like a "1" but it appears to be in the wrong location - and wrong size if it is. I think I confirmed it's a small date. If you disagree, I'd love to know it. :)

    20170222_231736.jpg 20170222_231757.jpg
     
  13. okbustchaser

    okbustchaser I may be old but I still appreciate a pretty bust Supporter

    Not the small 8, either. It is Overton 105.
     
    C-B-D likes this.
  14. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    If I had been able to nail the Overton from just that partial date pic, I would've been legennnnnndary.
     
    Brett_in_Sacto likes this.
  15. okbustchaser

    okbustchaser I may be old but I still appreciate a pretty bust Supporter

    For future reference, when referring to the 12/1 large 8 I've heard it said, "If you see the 1, it AIN"T!"
    1812 O-101o.jpg 1812 O-101r.jpg 1812-1date.jpg
     
    Last edited: Mar 6, 2017
    Paddy54 likes this.
  16. Brett_in_Sacto

    Brett_in_Sacto Well-Known Member

    Ok, so we are agreed that's a standard 1812 - and a few brainiacs have identified it as an O-105. (And I thank you!). I gotta wonder what is underneath the 2. Too bad it's so worn.

    Thanks all!
     
  17. lkeigwin

    lkeigwin Well-Known Member

    I love the look of your coin! Circulated cameo appearance. Nice.

    The O.105 obverse die was cracking badly around the date. Late die states are really impressive.

    My first thought was it was a common die chip. But I checked a lot of O.105's and couldn't see anything that matched up. Still, it is the most likely answer.

    Here's a LDS, just for fun.
    Lance.

    Screen Shot 2017-03-06 at 5.42.34 PM.png
    1812 O.105a PCGS-c AU53 obv.jpg 1812 O.105a PCGS-c AU53 rev.jpg
     
  18. okbustchaser

    okbustchaser I may be old but I still appreciate a pretty bust Supporter

    OP's coin is interesting. I originally thought that the chip was simply the start of the crack, but after looking at it again I don't see the die crack up through the 8 to the second 1 which occurs before the crack through the 2. Plus, it is in the wrong place to be the start of that crack anyway. Great coin that I would love to examine in hand sometime.
     
    lkeigwin likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page