1900 Lafayette Dollar, Do you think this coin should be CAC approved? (I dont)

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by geekpryde, Dec 31, 2025 at 12:31 PM.

?

Should this coin Be CAC stickered?

This poll will close on Jan 7, 2026 at 12:31 PM.
  1. Heck NO

    100.0%
  2. Yes

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. I dont know

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. geekpryde

    geekpryde Husband and Father Moderator

    I'm in the market for a CAC approved Lafayette dollar. This coin showed up on one of my saved searches.

    Upon closer inspection, I was surprised that this coin stickered.

    I'm not even going to list the PCGS numeric grade, its not relevant to why I think this coin shouldn't be CAC approved.

    [​IMG]

    This is no insult to the coin itself, overall I find it an acceptable circulated commemorative coin. Had it not been for certain areas of this coin, I would have bid on it. But I cannot do it, even with a CAC sticker.

    What do you see and what do you say?
     
    Mr. Numismatist likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. ToughCOINS

    ToughCOINS Dealer Member Moderator

    If the coin were not scratched and numerical grade was 40 or less, I say yes, and I’d say no to 45 or better.

    unfortunately, it is scratched (reverse), so emphatically no, even though the scratches are ancient.
     
  4. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    Not only should it not have a CAC, it should not be straight graded. I'm surprised they even put it in a holder! The scratches are worrisome enough, but the glue or residue all over the reverse is even worse! Normally they won't slab something with foreign substances on it.
     
    ldhair, BRandM, KBBPLL and 2 others like this.
  5. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    Agreed on both above statements.
     
    geekpryde and Mr. Numismatist like this.
  6. geekpryde

    geekpryde Husband and Father Moderator

    Ding Ding Ding, we have a winner! :singing:

    The glue in two major areas of the coin made start to question my sanity. :wacky: Was I seeing things, or misunderstanding something?

    Appears not, if other people are seeing this as well.

    My only thinking is that because glue / junk could theoretically be removed from the coin with acetone, perhaps its not considered permanent damage? Like it COULD be removed in the future, so sure, why not just slap a sticker on it? :p

    Keep in mind, I'm a CAC "fanboy", so this isn't coming from a place of hate. I am just shocked is all.
     
  7. geekpryde

    geekpryde Husband and Father Moderator

    that scratch is sort of interesting to me. I saw it, gave me a bit of a pause, but ultimately I was still willing to bid on the coin until I dug a bit deeper.

    I also have a coin with a very similar scratch pattern, also CAC approved. This one doesn't bother me a bit, but I can see other people wanting to tagged and bagged.

    29754438 template.jpg
     
  8. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    To me that coin should not have received a straight grade. So most certainly no to a CAC sticker. If I was in the market for one of these this would not be a coin that I would consider buying.
     
    geekpryde likes this.
  9. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    Your collection, your coin. If you're happy, great.

    I, personally, would not buy it. I can see PCGS grading it, but a scratch of that size should absolutely preclude a CAC! That's just my opinion, of course.
     
    geekpryde likes this.
  10. KBBPLL

    KBBPLL Well-Known Member

    I'll pile on. Even without the scratches and residue I'm not sure how it graded XF45 in the first place. CAC isn't infallible either.
     
    geekpryde likes this.
  11. ToughCOINS

    ToughCOINS Dealer Member Moderator

    This coin I would think market acceptable, as those 2 long scratches appear to be in the planchet before strike, unlike the innocuous shorter scratch at star 8.
     
    geekpryde likes this.
  12. Michael K

    Michael K Well-Known Member

    This coin is damaged.
     
    geekpryde likes this.
  13. BRandM

    BRandM Counterstamp Collector

    I agree, it shouldn't be straight graded OR CACd. Too many bad things going on with it.

    Bruce
     
    geekpryde likes this.
  14. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    I'm with the others in the "not cac worthy" camp. I noticed the scratches, then the residue, and also some darker areas highlighting the outlines of the horse and people (that one isn't as much of a problem but I think it lowers the eye appeal).
     
    geekpryde likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page