i recently found a 1940 week paint in my pocket. Change with a significant error I would love to hear everyone's comments. Suggestions on it's value edited
I just shot a 1957 BIE (actually a "pre" IBIE) that was a new discovery piece sent to me by a forum member. The final image sizes are 9000x9000, so I am hosting them on EasyZoom website. You can zoom in by double-clicking where you want to see. Each double-click doubles the magnification, and you can click 3 times, so a lot of zoom! The coin also has an RIDB that is listed as well! Obverse https://easyzoom.com/image/655697/album/0/4?mode=manage Reverse https://easyzoom.com/image/655695/album/0/4?mode=manage
I keep coming back to the 24-D. I can hardly imagine a grade MS64BN that does less to capture the nature of a coin. When I look at that essentially perfect obverse I can’t imagine what they were thinking. True, I can find a bit of corrosion under the reverse toning; maybe that is more widespread than revealed in the photo. The 22-D is a marvel. Virtually every 1922 that is shown apparently came from overused and worn-out dies. Again, I am baffled about what holds this from a MS66. What did they see? In both cases, if these were compared against the finest-known, are there demonstrable flaws, or is it just because some folks like mint red and others like toning?
I also thought the 24-D was under graded. In looking at the 24-D’s in CoinFacts there are a few in 64 that are similar. I’ll take the graders word for it. Only 31 have graded 65 and the higher grades only have 1 in each grade. As for the 22-D I haven’t seen any BN that looks higher or better. The only thing I can think of is CACG is being ultra conservative. Maybe it would grade higher in a PCGS slab.