My first stamps and a moral question.

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by Dafydd, Sep 14, 2025 at 6:19 PM.

  1. Dafydd

    Dafydd Supporter! Supporter

    Ok the title was clickbait because you might have wondered what crazy was posting stamps on a coin forum.

    These are too nice to post as bullion as they were clearly made for collectors and they are not coins or medallions so I guess this is where I should post. I've asked this question elsewhere and I always get great opinions on this forum.

    A local dealer showed me these sterling .925 silver stamps that had just come in as bullion. He had paid under spot rate and intended to melt them saying he didn’t think his customers would be interested in them. I said I was one customer that was interested and bought them a little over silver spot rate. I thought they were exquisite. Here they are. As usual better in hand than my photography.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    I have absolutely no interest in collecting stamps as I consider them vulnerable certainly to someone like me and easy to damage stain or lose. Famously I lost an autograph of the Duke of Wellington of Waterloo fame. It’s not actually lost, it will be in the pages of a book I read 12 years ago but the problem is I don’t know which one and its not in any of the obvious ones. Hopefully it will turn up or my descendants may find it. Little bits of paper and me don’t mix well.

    Back to these “stamps” they are proof state and hallmarked, there are a couple of fingerprints I will try and remove with acetone.

    What went through my mind when I was shown them was the Nelson and William Hunt debacle when they manipulated the silver market in 1979 and it rose from $6 to $50 before collapsing losing 50% in one day called “Silver Thursday”. Around this time, I started working in the nonferrous foundry business, and a metal smelter I knew was melting beautiful 17th and 18th Century silver artefacts such as Candelabra, Salvers, Goblets, Cutlery sets etc with people cashing in on achieving higher prices for scrap than they could sell as “unfashionable antiques”. Even crucifixes went into the melt, and nothing was sacred. I saw some of this and was disgusted and mortified but did not have the disposable income to buy anything. By coincidence, last night I viewed a YouTube video with some clown breaking open a pre-1965 tube of silver dimes and explaining that the face value was only $5 but he could melt them, and they would be worth $150.00. I could tell by the way he was handling them and talking about them that there was absolutely no intent to consider any numismatic value.

    Some of the coins were early and each could have been a history lesson to someone. Maybe they don’t have great numismatic value now, but I think it’s a shame to destroy them and maybe there should be a law to stop it?

    I did a little research and learnt that it is permissible to melt pre-1965 silver in the USA but illegal to melt nickels and dimes because the nickel and copper content sometimes is worth more than the coin and this could have an adverse effect on the Treasury.

    In the UK it is illegal to melt any coin of the realm of any date or time. Offenders face big fines and can be jailed for up to two years. Individuals can ask HM Treasury for a license in theory, but they are only granted to the Royal Mint for recycling purposes. The crux of the matter is that the coins I saw being broken from the rolls could still be used as bullion so there is no need to melt them, and to allow it, is destroying history. I can appreciate that bars are easier to stack than coins but once the coins are gone, they are gone. This could drift into politics, and I don't want to go there in respect of freedoms but is it a good thing to melt coins that are legible as we are losing some history? In my opinion, it is not a good idea, nor was it a good idea to destroy beautiful works of art in 1980 to make a fast buck.

    If we consider Marc Antony Fleet denarii these were still circulating 100 years after being minted because of their silver content and it doesn’t appear that there was wholesale recycling of them from the condition and number extant.

    What do you think?
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Sep 15, 2025 at 3:46 AM
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Mr. Numismatist

    Mr. Numismatist Strawberry Token Enthusiast

    I believe that high precious metal prices are more harmful to numismatics than helpful. Thanks for sharing!
     
    SensibleSal66, NOS and Dafydd like this.
  4. Joshua Lemons

    Joshua Lemons Well-Known Member Supporter

    Neat! Those are quite attractive pieces!
     
    SensibleSal66 likes this.
  5. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins Supporter

    Most marvelous treatise......except when you repeat yourself, but I do that all the time. (devil)
     
  6. rte

    rte Well-Known Member

    My 2 sense worth.
    Buy what you like and you can't save it all.
     
    SensibleSal66 likes this.
  7. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins Supporter

    And indeed you can't take it with you when you depart this existence. Enjoy it while you can.....
     
    SensibleSal66 likes this.
  8. Hiddendragon

    Hiddendragon World coin collector

    First I love the stamps that you got. Second, I feel like American dealers don't usually melt coins because they are easy to sell because they are a recognizable amount and people like to buy them that way. Like there are people who buy silver to prepare for a time when they think money will be worthless and silver will be used for purchases, and they want to have it in spendable pieces, not big bars.

    I know that a lot of dealers will buy foreign silver and just melt it down and I think that's the real tragedy because they neither know nor care what they have. I'm sure so many collectible coins have met their fate there. One coin shop near me is like this. The foreign silver they buy just goes in a melt bucket and it goes to the refinery. I hate to think about what goes in there.
     
  9. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    Somewhere I have a bag of similar items, but with (if I remember correctly) US presidents on them. The ones I have are .999 silver, with an antiqued finish.
     
    SensibleSal66 likes this.
  10. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    You don’t show the other side. If your dealer bought and sold them as bullion and they are .925 Sterling as stated then they are just that. A novelty item of Sterling silver minted in the likeness of a postage stamp. One is dated 1924. It’s not a stamp, it’s bullion. Probably made by the Franklin Mint or someone like that. They are very interesting but they are bullion. Enjoy by them. I would!
     
  11. Dafydd

    Dafydd Supporter! Supporter

    Good point, @green18 and thanks for pointing this out. TBH If something is longer than a couple of sentences I write in word and cut and paste because in the past I have posted things in mid debate and by the time I finish I have "missed the boat" and everyone has moved on.
     
  12. Dafydd

    Dafydd Supporter! Supporter

    Thanks for commenting @Collecting Nut . Here are the reverses which are hall marked .925. Stamps back.jpg

    The 1924 dated one is a reproduction of the stamp on the right below.
    Stamps 1924.jpg
    These are not negotiable currency so not coins and could be considered bullion but from my perspective as they were accompanied by historical notes and are facsimiles of another collectible I would call them medallions.
    I'm glad I saved them from melting and I will enjoy them and should probably not be so impulsive. I believe I am in your club @Collecting Nut a "Borderline Hoarder".
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page