Whizzed, cleaned, or just mint luster?

Discussion in 'World Coins' started by The Meat man, Aug 24, 2025 at 6:50 PM.

  1. The Meat man

    The Meat man Supporter! Supporter

    I recently obtained an 1862 silver rupee. In hand, the coin appears to exhibit nice bands of mint luster. On close examination, however, I noticed a pattern of marks across the surfaces. They seem to be more in the fields than anywhere else.

    DSC_0126 - Copy.JPG

    DSC_0126 - Copy (2).JPG

    I own a couple "whizzed" coins and this coin doesn't look like them, but...being new to modern coins I'm wondering if the marks on this rupee are normal mint luster, or if they are cleaning marks, or whizzing marks.

    Thanks!
     
    Heavymetal and fretboard like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. longnine009

    longnine009 Darwin has to eat too. Supporter

    They appear (to me) to be under not across the letters. If so, that would be something with the die, such as polishing.
     
  4. Mr. Numismatist

    Mr. Numismatist Strawberry Token Enthusiast

    They might be radial flow lines (caused by die deterioration), but I'm not quite sure. Are the areas with the "lines" more lustrous/shiny?
     
    Collecting Nut and The Meat man like this.
  5. Spark1951

    Spark1951 Accomplishment, not Activity

    That’s what I think, too, die polishing reaching the surface and shallow devices but not the deeper areas of the die.
     
  6. The Meat man

    The Meat man Supporter! Supporter

    That makes sense. It is pretty much restricted to the fields and doesn't appear to hit the edges of the lettering or go over it, like you'd expect with whizzing.

    Hard to tell, but I think so. Would this be from microscopic fractures in the die surface?
     
  7. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    +1
     
    Mr. Numismatist and The Meat man like this.
  8. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan Collecting for 49 years Moderator

    +2
     
    Mr. Numismatist and The Meat man like this.
  9. Heavymetal

    Heavymetal Supporter! Supporter

    Nice. Do we get to see the whole coin?
     
    The Meat man likes this.
  10. The Meat man

    The Meat man Supporter! Supporter

    Soon! I want to take some better photos and then I'll have it ready to post. :)
     
  11. Mr. Numismatist

    Mr. Numismatist Strawberry Token Enthusiast

    It's similar to dirt erosion during a heavy rain. As the metal flows to fill the design, it slowly "erodes" the dies.
     
    longnine009 and The Meat man like this.
  12. longnine009

    longnine009 Darwin has to eat too. Supporter

    The erosion causes the dies to be etched with microscopic lines. Light reflects off those lines causing a "cart wheel" effect on BU coins.

    But they are microscopic. I'm not sure they wil show at all on an image.
     
  13. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    I agree
     
    Mr. Numismatist and The Meat man like this.
  14. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    The lines in the OP photo correspond to what I see on a lustrous Kennedy half, which is about the same diameter. I can make those out clearly with a 10x loupe. So "microscopic" is a bit of a stretch, at least if the die's seen some wear.
     
    longnine009 and The Meat man like this.
  15. Heavymetal

    Heavymetal Supporter! Supporter

    I see die clash marks obv between portrait & U of Queen. That die got some abrasive work.
     
    The Meat man likes this.
  16. dcarr

    dcarr Mint-Master

    Flow lines are usually radial. The lines on the coin shown are not radial. They appear to be curved. This might sometimes be an indication of whizzing.

    However, in this case, I think the lines are a form of luster from die erosion. The reason that the lines are on an arc path might be because the coin was struck on a large screw press. The impact of the rotating screw on the back of the die can cause the die to twist a little bit as it strikes.
     
    The Meat man and longnine009 like this.
  17. The Meat man

    The Meat man Supporter! Supporter

    Thanks for the input everyone! I'm glad it's not a manipulated surface. The striations are not really visible to the unaided eye and even under magnification, it depends on how the light is hitting it.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page