Can anyone tell me what a dollar bill like this might be worth. Any and all help in greatly appreciated. Thank you i n advance
That is not a wet ink transfer issue. That didn't occur at the BEP A wet ink transfer will show the image in reverse and horizontal to the bill. Not vertically. Someone created that alteration using a copy machine. Next time create your thread in the Paper Money section of CoinTalk. It is still worth $1.00
That is weird because it came in a $100 wrap of sequential new bills and this was between a serial number before and after, I did post it on the paper money thread but all I got was that it was cool. I am attaching the pictures that I posted there.
Actually this looks like a Fold-over Printing error. Another bill could have been folded over this during printing. I am specialized in the paper and plastic industry considered I've worked on printing for the past 25 years now. This happens on occasion where I work as well. Also, the process of printing money involves two separate intaglio printing stages, with the back of the bill printed first, then the front so this very well could have happened. Nothing is perfect. Not even the BEP. However I could be mistaken and someone did possibly throw it in a printer as another user stated. But if you indeed took this out of a stack then it is a real error.
I know precious little of paper money but I am quite sure that when the ink is still wet in the printing process, neither the engravings for, nor the bills on the sheet are separated by more than their normal spacing. If you truly believe this impression is not a contrivance, how is it then that the secondary impression is so remarkably complete, yet there is no trace of impressions of bills to either side of it?
And when it smells like fish? Stay away from the fish department. Never have I seen such a thing, . Calling "the magic" @Jersey magic man. The bearded wiseman.
I don't know anything about the BEP printing process, or how you would do this on a copy machine. Either way, I'm curious how there is a ghost of a serial number C39173___B, but no treasury seal? I copied the "error" piece and rotated it to see how it aligns with the normal section. Edit: I also see some signs of circulation - two bent corners and a slight bow in the center. But why would anyone create an "error" only to stick it between sequential notes? OP, how did you obtain this, who from, what was it marketed as, etc.
I think the picture or scan did not reproduce properly on the printer. If the printer was set for grey scale or black only it may have not printed correctly and left out most of the green printing. Again, this is just my theory without the note in hand.
The printer may have printed some green, just not what it should have been. Again, without the note in hand it is all guess work. However, I cannot fathom how this would happen at the BEP.
My incredibly limited understanding of the currency printing process is that sequentially numbered notes are printed on the sheets above and below the note in question. The sequential numbering is not on the same sheet as the note in question. So when the stack of 100 sheets goes to the cutting machine the stack is sequentially numbered when banded. This explanation is not endorsing the OP note as a bona fide error. It is just offering an explanation of why there's no indication of the same overprinting on the two notes on either side of the numbered note in this discussion.