The copper layer is 20 microns thick. No matter . . . it’s the outer layer of the coin under greatest stress, so yes, annealing of the copper is desirable to promote it stretching without cracking when struck.
I have been reading a lot lately about the annealing of the planchets, having to do with weak strikes, Planchet striations flat surfaces happen all the time on most BS Lincolns. More common among early shield cents. I would lean to the design and pairing of dies.
I don't think the design and pairing of the dies had much to do with the appearance of the OP's coin. If dies were poorly designed, you likely would likely not find coins fully executed side-to-side among all coins of this design, instead finding some areas of the coin well-struck, and other areas consistently lacking in detail. The dull look of this coin points further toward a rare event affecting the outcome. If all steps in the normal minting procedure were followed, the coin would be brighter and more lustrous than it is, and hydraulic presses in normal production runs would ensure that virtually the same level of design detail was imparted upon all normally prepared planchets. Finally, if poor design, manufacture and / or pairing of dies were responsible for the appearance of the OP's coin, a much larger number of such examples would have been found.
I like ur explanation. Also here’s another post and better pics the same coin pictured here the 2023 D along with a 2023 similar in appearance and the rim and edge. https://www.cointalk.com/threads/2023-d-2023-major-struck-thru-grease-shield-cents.416577/
I was speaking in general, about shield cents. I have no idea what happened to the OP coin. Denver coins show up all the time with unstruck planchet striations on the high points of the obv.