GtGx2 1887 Morgan 1905 IHC

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by heavycam.monstervam, Dec 18, 2016.

  1. heavycam.monstervam

    heavycam.monstervam Outlaw Trucker & Coin Hillbilly

    20161219_201346.jpg 20161219_201301.jpg 20161219_201420.jpg 20161219_201539.jpg

    Try these, i love learning new series!

    BTW the flag of the 1 is doubled south and either the 9 is doubled south or thats a die chip making it a closed 9 so to speak
    Looks like the 5 has the same deal, secondary flag south
     
    Last edited: Dec 19, 2016
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. heavycam.monstervam

    heavycam.monstervam Outlaw Trucker & Coin Hillbilly

    Close as i can get w/o a microscope 20161219_203743.jpg 20161219_203805.jpg
     
  4. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    Best match is the S-21 but the reverse is wrong. I don't know what it is.
     
    heavycam.monstervam likes this.
  5. heavycam.monstervam

    heavycam.monstervam Outlaw Trucker & Coin Hillbilly

    They only produced 80 million, I'm sure snow hasn't discovered ALL the dies yet. Thx 4 looking, and I wasn't gonna mention this but, right underneath the 1 & above the dentils looks like a faint outline of the loop of a 9 or 8, but It could just be from staring at it too long:wacky:
     
  6. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    My book is 7 years old. It stops at S-30. I'll bet he has added more by now.
     
    heavycam.monstervam likes this.
  7. Cascade

    Cascade CAC Grader, Founding Member

    Counterfeit... Added Y :p
     
    heavycam.monstervam likes this.
  8. chascat

    chascat Well-Known Member

    I couldn,t find any matches.
     
    heavycam.monstervam likes this.
  9. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    Is the Morgan a technical 63 that got bumped to a 64 due to color?
     
  10. SuperDave

    SuperDave Free the Cartwheels!

    Not in my opinion; the obverse looks a technical (decent, not high-end) 65. It's why I mentioned it as "reverse limited" in my post. You have to look pretty darn close at toners for details hidden by the color, and in this case the OP was nice enough to offer a pair of large images shot under two different lighting setups. That allows a fairly accurate opinion of the actual technical merit - one should see every mark on the coin from one angle or the other. I'm just surprised they didn't offer it the "+" for the color.
     
    heavycam.monstervam likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page