GTG 1895 O

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by fish4uinmd, Dec 5, 2016.

  1. fish4uinmd

    fish4uinmd Well-Known Member

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    I'm gonna say XF45.
     
  4. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

    45 & cleaned

    Edit: By cleaned I mean overdipped.
     
    Last edited: Dec 5, 2016
  5. Coinlover67

    Coinlover67 Well-Known Member

    Xf 40/45

    Sent from my A463BG using Tapatalk
     
  6. Evan8

    Evan8 A Little Off Center

    Ugh these suck to grade. AU-50 not cleaned
     
  7. fish4uinmd

    fish4uinmd Well-Known Member

    Yeah, they do...that's why I'm asking the experts.
     
    Evan8 likes this.
  8. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    I think XF is being generous.

    Chris
     
  9. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

    That's a tough one vf/xf ???
     
  10. stldanceartist

    stldanceartist Minister of Silly Walks

    Honestly, I'm going to assume that the lighting is to blame (causing too many hairlines/nicks to look bigger than they look in "real life") and say it could be an AU53-55. If you make me choose one, I'll say 55.

    I had an NGC XF45 that looked much, much worse.
     
  11. Cascade

    Cascade CAC Grader, Founding Member

    45. Could have made 50 though
     
  12. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    That's what I felt like too. I think this coin probably looks much less "cleaned" in hand.
     
  13. charlottedude

    charlottedude Novice Collector

    XF45, but appears to have been vigorously dipped.
     
  14. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

  15. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    45 and either it is your picture or that has been cleaned.
     
  16. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    EF-45 details. Cleaned.
     
  17. fish4uinmd

    fish4uinmd Well-Known Member

    It's an AU-53 straight graded...I forgot to put it in my watch list and can't find the dang coin this am! From Eternity coins in Boston
     
  18. Cascade

    Cascade CAC Grader, Founding Member

    Nice. I knew it would most likely be straight graded but I though it would top out at 50. It probably looks a bit better in hand
     
  19. fish4uinmd

    fish4uinmd Well-Known Member

    It certainly looked cleaned to me...or messed with in some way.
     
  20. stldanceartist

    stldanceartist Minister of Silly Walks

    Having photographed a few coins, I've run across that issue - you see it in hand, then you take the photo and you think, "Ugh, is that the same coin?" Kind of like looking at a toned coin in natural sunlight and then under an undiffused IKEA Jansjo light. Yikes.
     
  21. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    It's possible the photograph makes it look worse. I bought a modern business strike coin some time ago that was graded by NGC with a "PL" designation. I had always wanted a modern PL circulation coin...and the price was low so I jumped on it. The photos of the coin in the eBay add looked horrible...as if someone had taken a piece of steel wool to it. I took a chance because I trusted NGC and the price was low enough. What did I get...a lovely PL coin that looks great in hand. But, when you photograph it (if not really careful)...you get a really ugly look. It's really hard to photograph accurately.

    That said, this is a key date Morgan and I have seen a bunch of...questionable coins in slabs. So, it'd be interesting to see it in hand.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page