Constantius Gallus - FEL TEMP - Fallen Horseman (again)

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by maridvnvm, Dec 3, 2016.

  1. maridvnvm

    maridvnvm Well-Known Member

    I have recently obtained this AE3 of Constantius Gallus from Siscia which seems to be a bit of an oddity.

    It is an AE3.

    Obv:– DN CONSTANTIVS IVN NOB C, Bare, bust draped and cuirassed right; A behind bust
    Rev:– FEL TEMP REPARATIO, Soldier spearing fallen horseman, who is wearing a Phrygian cap, reaching backwards
    Minted in Siscia (// BSIS),
    Reference:– It would appear to be unlisted unless I am missing something.
    It measures 19.20 mm and weighs 2.44 gms

    [​IMG]

    The early issues from Siscia with the A behind the bust measure in at 21-22. These issues seem to have attributes (e.g. III) in the left field on the reverse or additional attributes in the exe. (e.g. starts, crescents and dots). The horseman always seems to be bare headed for these issues.

    The later issues where the a behind the bust is lost drop in size to 18-19 mm. These drop these attributes with just ASIS in exe or ASIS Retrograde Z in exe (A here being the various workshops). The horseman always seems to wear a Phrygian cap for these issues.

    My coin below doesn't seem to fint into either of these mixing the bust from the earlier issues and a reverse from the later issues whilst being cloaser to the the size of the later issues.

    What am I missing?

    Martin
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Pishpash

    Pishpash Well-Known Member

    Drop Dane a line.
     
    dougsmit likes this.
  4. maridvnvm

    maridvnvm Well-Known Member

    I have already mailed Dane.
     
    dougsmit likes this.
  5. Pishpash

    Pishpash Well-Known Member

    Have you looked through her collection? I used to have a link but lost it.
     
  6. maridvnvm

    maridvnvm Well-Known Member

    Been through her RIC list and her collection, checked RIC, checked wildwinds.
     
  7. Roman Collector

    Roman Collector Well-Known Member

    That is really weird, because the reverse is absolutely that of RIC viii, p. 375, no. 351 and just above the listing it says, "Fourth series: no letter behind busts."

    Capture.JPG
     
  8. maridvnvm

    maridvnvm Well-Known Member

    I know.
    I have a couple of 351s.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    Alegandron, Pishpash and Bing like this.
  9. dougsmit

    dougsmit Member

    An A on so small a coin seems all too wrong. I will be interested in Dane's theory.
     
  10. randygeki

    randygeki Coin Collector

    An odd, but cool find.
     
  11. maridvnvm

    maridvnvm Well-Known Member

    I've just seen how dark this image is on some monitors. I have created a lightened version.

    [​IMG]

    Which image works best?
     
  12. Bing

    Bing Illegitimi non carborundum Supporter

    This second image looks much better on my monitor.
     
    rrdenarius likes this.
  13. Magnus Maximus

    Magnus Maximus Dulce et Decorum est....

    Nice coin Martin! I love everyone about your little AE.
    In my personal opinion the style of Silver and bronze coins from Sisca are inferior to the coins from other mints in the Empire. The designs make the Emperors features look frog like, if you catch my drift.
    See
    IMG_1731.JPG

    IMG_1730.JPG

    Maybe i'm just crazy though:wacky:
     
  14. Pishpash

    Pishpash Well-Known Member

    Yeah, probably :D
     
  15. Magnus Maximus

    Magnus Maximus Dulce et Decorum est....

    At least I'm not Justin II level crazy! :smuggrin::wacky:
     
    Pishpash likes this.
  16. randygeki

    randygeki Coin Collector

    O kinda like some of the coins from Siscia.
    1004301.JPG
    0015.JPG
    017-1.JPG
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page