NGC Certified "First Day of Issue" BU Abraham Lincoln Golden Dollar

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by SilverForLife, Aug 16, 2012.

  1. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

    Early releases were as much garbage four years ago as they are today. Or vice versa.
     
    Pickin and Grinin likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    Yeah, I was as adamant 4 years ago about this subject as I am today/

    Chris
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  4. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    First Strikes and Early Releases are the TPGS' equivalent of the eBay bidiots.

    Chris
     
  5. Johndoe2000$

    Johndoe2000$ Well-Known Member

    Both are meaningless, but at least early release is factual, first strike is an outright lie.
     
  6. merrill01

    merrill01 Member

    What is TPGs?
    Third Party Graders, like PCGS,ANACS,NGC, etc.
     
  7. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    TPGS.........Third Party Grading Service

    Chris;)
     
  8. Coinchemistry 2012

    Coinchemistry 2012 Well-Known Member

    Umm... I think he has a point about the "early release" labels regardless of design. NGC originally used the term first strike but was sued for it and as part of the settlement, it discontinued the use of the old term. It is absolutely worthless and is nothing more than a way to promote submissions for labels and draw more submissions. If it didn't, PCGS's equivalent would take away submissions, so yeah, it is a way for them to make money.
     
  9. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    Granted, the Florida lawsuit forced NGC to change from First Strike to Early Releases, but the only reason PCGS wasn't included in that lawsuit is because they are based in California, not Florida. What do you think they would have done if they were a Florida corporation? Regardless, do you think NGC should have given in completely and allowed PCGS to take over a larger share of that market?

    Chris
     
  10. Coinchemistry 2012

    Coinchemistry 2012 Well-Known Member

    No, but let's not pretend that economic consideration of the TPGS's bottom line wasn't an issue. That was my point. If it wasn't about money, NGC wouldn't even grade modern coins at all. Remember that at one time, NGC refused to grade moderns because it thought it would create artificial scarcity. It is interesting how time has changed everything. Now they grade moderns and add special labels all to generate submissions and more revenue. The post I responded to suggested that the TPGS's bottom line wasn't at play.
     
    cpm9ball likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page