1878 CC Morgan

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Swervo513, Nov 18, 2016.

  1. Swervo513

    Swervo513 Well-Known Member

    Hi all. Just purchased this coin. I'm very happy with it but I wanted to see if I paid appropriately for it. What would you grade and value this coin at? I apologize in advance for the poor picture quality. I posted a few different ones of the same coin to compensate. Thanks for looking.

    Larry

    IMG_0856.JPG IMG_0857.JPG IMG_0850.JPG IMG_0851.JPG IMG_0855.JPG IMG_0858.JPG
     
    Eric White likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Johndoe2000$

    Johndoe2000$ Well-Known Member

    Good looking coin. 63/64 maybe, surface not great imo. But I am not a great judge of Morgan dollars.
     
  4. Swervo513

    Swervo513 Well-Known Member

    That's what they had it graded at. Not a great surface indeed.
     
  5. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    It maxes out at 63, I think. The haziness of the obverse surfaces is unattractive, and will bring the grade down.
     
  6. alurid

    alurid Well-Known Member

    Great looking coin for it age. I can't see any bag marks, but am wondering why the mint mark looks damaged.
     
  7. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

    I agree with 63. I kinda like morgans that don't look freshly dipped.
     
  8. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

  9. messydesk

    messydesk Well-Known Member

    62-63. The picture of it in the flip shows the surfaces the best. There's an outside chance it's an AU58, but I can't make that conclusion from the pictures.
     
  10. Swervo513

    Swervo513 Well-Known Member

    Thanks guys. Makes me feel better about the purchase. This is my first Carson City and I'm pretty excited about it. One part does concern me though. The reverse left wing of the bird is a bit of a weak strike. Any opinions about this?
     
  11. messydesk

    messydesk Well-Known Member

    I don't see strike issues with that coin. 78-CC is typically well struck, and this is no exception.
     
  12. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    I looked for a while at the pictures to try and figure that out, but I really didn't see any discoloration/flattening/luster breaks on her cheek or the eagle's breast. Could it be hidden in the photo's? Sure. But it looks good from what I'm seeing.
     
  13. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Mint mark looks just fine to me--I think it is the pictures. Definitely an uncirculated coin--any lack of luster is from the photo, as you can clearly see the great strike, and I see no signs of light surface wear. I think that 63 is most likely, and in proper light, it would be a really nice looking coin.
     
    Swervo513 likes this.
  14. Swervo513

    Swervo513 Well-Known Member

    Thanks for the responses guys. When looking in the pcgs registry I notice three varieties of this coin. Can you guys tell me what they mean and which one my coin is?
    IMG_0868.PNG
     
  15. alurid

    alurid Well-Known Member

    Well you got your MS =mint state, then your MSPL= mint state, proof-like
    and your MSDMPL = mint state,deep mirror, proof-like.
     
    Swervo513 likes this.
  16. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title] Supporter

    I'm gonna call this one MS62. Doesn't have the best surfaces but I don't see any wear. I like it
     
    Swervo513 likes this.
  17. jrs146

    jrs146 Active Member

    I'm guessing MS63


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  18. SuperDave

    SuperDave Free the Cartwheels!

    I'm guessing you're unaware of VAMs, the acronym for the naming system under which Morgan varieties are categorized. There are about twenty varieties identified for 1878-CC. Yours has the Short Nock reverse and an unbroken 4th right star, narrowing the field considerably, and I've tentatively identified it as VAM-27:

    http://www.vamworld.com/1878-CC+VAM-27
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  19. Peter Brown

    Peter Brown New Member

    I also agree with 62 - 63.
     
  20. Golden age

    Golden age Go for the gold

  21. chascat

    chascat Well-Known Member

    62....Would have to hold it to make an accurate choice. Nice coin!
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page