The Denmark 1902 5 Ore imaged below appears to be an overdate, with the 9 punched over an 8. I am inquiring with members more knowledgeable than myself and thus more familiar with the 5 Ore series whether my attribution is in fact correct or, have I simply got it wrong. It seems more likely that the last two digits would more likely be the subject of an overdate. All thoughts welcome.
Looks good to me. I don't see it listed but there are comparable overdates in other small bronze of the series. I have (I believe) a 1902/802 and a 1904/804 1 øre:
Thanks mbe for responding. Your examples of 1 ore overdates ad credence to my claim of a 5 ore example. Again, thanks for responding...much appreciated!!
