As if you needed another reason to think grading ancients was silly

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by H8_modern, Nov 3, 2016.

  1. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    That, or reacting to getting hit in the left eye with that snowball.
     
    Alegandron and stevex6 like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Aethelred

    Aethelred The Old Dead King

    I only use two grades with the ancient coins I own or am thinking about buying, they are:

    1. I like the way it looks

    2. I do not like the way it looks
     
    Kentucky, Carthago, Insider and 4 others like this.
  4. Alegandron

    Alegandron "ΤΩΙ ΚΡΑΤΙΣΤΩΙ..." ΜΕΓΑΣ ΑΛΕΞΑΝΔΡΟΣ, June 323 BCE

    You Nailed it!

    oh, and I might add for me: 3. Historical juncture...
     
    Nicholas Molinari, Aethelred and TIF like this.
  5. Aethelred

    Aethelred The Old Dead King

    Well Stated! There a many coins in my collection that grade "I do not like the way it looks" but that are historically meaningful or interesting.
     
    Alegandron likes this.
  6. Mikey Zee

    Mikey Zee Delenda Est Carthago

    This has been a spirited and interesting thread:D

    Needless to say I also agree the OP is grossly over graded. I rarely agree with any assigned 'grade' and assess a coin details and it's overall eye-appeal within my own personal parameters.

    Once I owned several thousands of coins and about 3/4's of them were 'moderns', so I suppose I 'instinctively' place my subjective grade on all I'm interested in while comparing them to other similar types (for reasonable market value as I HATE overpaying LOL). Generally, I select coins that are most interesting to me for all the reasons @Alegandron has stated--- normal wear being less a concern than surface damage...... and historical context, cool devices and centering being most important to me within the price range I am willing to pay.
     
    Alegandron and Aethelred like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page