Canada 1 cent 1893/93

Discussion in 'World Coins' started by SRSNUM, Jul 12, 2024.

  1. SRSNUM

    SRSNUM Well-Known Member

    The subject coin imaged below appears to be a Canada 1 cent 1893, re-punched 93. Any thoughts as to rarity, value etc., most welcome.

    CANADA1CENT1893OVER93LOT065OBV.jpg CANADA1CENT1893OVER93LOT065OBV2.jpg CANADA1CENT1893OVER93LOT065REV.jpg
     
    alurid likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Spark1951

    Spark1951 Accomplishment, not Activity

    Honestly, it looks more like die deterioration than RPD. Check Coins and Canada for listings. Nice coin, BTW…has survived well for a 131 yo coin…imo…Spark
     
  4. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    That's from the strike.
     
  5. alurid

    alurid Well-Known Member

  6. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    Looks like it’s doubled from a worn die to me.
     
  7. SRSNUM

    SRSNUM Well-Known Member

    Many thanks to Spark1951, eddiespin, alurid & CollectingNut for responding. With their help, I believe I was able to more fully attribute the item.

    Below, find an image of a second example of the "1893/93", which was purchased with the first example 45 or 50 years ago at an auction at Smith College in Northhampton, Massachusetts. As an aside, these pieces came in a small black snap purse along with among other coins, a Lauzon ferry token.

    Examining the "tripled 9" 1893 imaged at the CoinandCanada website on the link supplied by alurid (further down the page), I believe there is a solid match with the image below.

    Notice that the "9" below (yellow & red arrows) exhibits similar tripling to the C&C 1893 tripled '9'. In addition, the red arrow at the bottom right of the "9" shows a sliver of doubling emerging to the left, also shown on the C&C coin.

    Notice also that the "3" in both coins obtained at Smith, exhibits a sliver emerging from the bottom to the left. It seems that the second coin should be labeled 1893 tripled 9-doubled 3 or something to that effect. The first Smith coin is a bit too beat-up to be considered a double of the first Smith coin, but, might deserve an 1893 doubled 9-doubled 3 designation?

    Of course, it is possible that I may have gotten this analysis wrong. SNAFUs do happen. Further thoughts solicited and welcome.

    Again, many thanks to all who responded...very much appreciated !!


    CANADA1CENT1893OVER93LOT066OBV.jpg CANADA1CENT1893OVER93LOT066REV.jpg CANADA1CENT1893OVER93LOT066REV2.jpg
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Jul 12, 2024
    alurid likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page